Jump to content
Caribou

Badly edited books.

Recommended Posts

Caribou

I was re-reading hunger games books tonight bc, I felt like some mind numbing drivel. Except, I didn’t realise until tonight how badly it was written. How many times in dialogue do you need to say ‘I say’ ‘gale says’ I say’ surely surely you could evoke a bit more than that?

 

I recognise it’s popular bc of its unique dystopian world, but I’m sad, It reads poorly.

 

Are there any other popular books i should never read again to save myself the misery of badly edited work?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lazycritter

Probably most teen angst books I'd say

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Reader

A Little Life - needed a machete taken to it.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
robhat

Harry Potter 5?

 

:D

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
~Jolly_F~

Harry Potter 5?

 

:D

 

You take that back.....

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Caribou

Scandalous!

 

I refuse to hear a bad word about HP. :lol:

 

I heard the handmaids tale was poorly edited but not read it myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ayr

Have not read the hunger games but I found that with the twilight series! I don't know what was wrong with me when i read them the first time but I didn't mind them. Maybe the fact I read them at work in a mind numbing job.

 

I then thought I'd give them a re-read a year later and couldn't believe how badly written they were. I couldn't finish them the second time around.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
IamtheMumma

I got about 20 pages into 50 shades of domestic violence. Very poorly edited from memory.

 

There was another one that I couldn't read because it was just trash. Maybe it was Twilight?

  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sugarplum Poobah

Harry Potter 5?

 

:D

 

And 6 as well. Man they need more editing. Badly.

 

If you're looking at YA lit though, the writing tends to be different to adult books. Which is why something like the Hunger Games (I assume) seems too spelt out (for want of a better way to put it).

 

Ironically I have a (slightly ironic) theory that what actually defines literary fiction is the absence of attributed dialogue. Check out the Peter Temple novel that won the Miles Franklin. I had to annotate a couple of passages to work out who was saying what...

 

Edited for clarification, because what I meant to say is that YA writing is often structurally different to adult fiction, but it came out as different editing. The perils of posting after a couple (ahem) of glasses of wine

Edited by Nasty Poobah

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jane Jetson

See for me, lots of "said" - or "say/says" if we're in the present tense like Hunger Games - is good, because it melts into the background and helps make the speech seamless.

 

What I can't stand is when authors (or PR people, frankly, they're worse) decide that they can't run with nice, ordinary old "said". Then you've got people adding, commenting, expostulating, explaining, exhorting, and in the end jarring me out of whatever it is I'm trying to read.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Crombek

Most series of books that continues on beyond book 10 or so. Editors (and authors!) seem to feel they no longer have to invest any time and effort into a decent book, and that they can get by on the goodwill of loyal readers. There’s been a rather big one recently with 2 very obvious continuity errors - vital to the world building. How did it get past, not once but twice! Sometimes I even suspect a ghostwriter.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kiwi Bicycle

Not a badly edited book, but a case of editors stuffed up.

A favourite fantasy writer of mine, Mercedes Lackey, released last year a first book of a new trilogy.

The synopsis on the dust jacket didn't match the storyline in the book at all. Apparently a very old plot overview was used ( like while the book was being written). Misty actually addresses it on her website apologizing. The next print run corrected it. I borrowed it from the library and had a laugh as their copy was the one with an error.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Acidulous Osprey

Most series of books that continues on beyond book 10 or so. Editors (and authors!) seem to feel they no longer have to invest any time and effort into a decent book, and that they can get by on the goodwill of loyal readers. There’s been a rather big one recently with 2 very obvious continuity errors - vital to the world building. How did it get past, not once but twice! Sometimes I even suspect a ghostwriter.

 

Hey hey hey, nope, do not blame the editors not wanting to invest the time and effort into the book. That's rarely the case. Rowling was at a point in her career she could ignore her editors.

 

The standards for editing YA are the same as for editing any other book.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Crombek

 

 

Hey hey hey, nope, do not blame the editors not wanting to invest the time and effort into the book. That's rarely the case. Rowling was at a point in her career she could ignore her editors.

 

The standards for editing YA are the same as for editing any other book.

 

I actually didn’t think the later HP’s were that bad! Nah it’s J R Wards recent release I’m thinking of - a character can suddenly do something twice that he has never been able to & should not be able to & it’s a pretty big deal in earlier books.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Chocolate Addict

Fifty shades of crap. Horrible, horrible book with bad writing and bad grammar.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Starflash

Boys Will Be Boys. I loved Fight Like A Girl but thought the second book needed more tightening and framing!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Daffy2016

The most recent Phryne Fisher novel - murder and Mendelssohn, I think? I was so disappointed, I love the other books and this one was meandering and not well plotted - really needed a sharp knife to it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JBH

Shantaram. A great yarn, but the writing was terribly distracting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
StartledFlamingo

Ironically I have a (slightly ironic) theory that what actually defines literary fiction is the absence of attributed dialogue. Check out the Peter Temple novel that won the Miles Franklin. I had to annotate a couple of passages to work out who was saying what...

 

Have you read any of the Thursday Next books by Jasper Fford. I can't remember which but in one of them the characters use unattributed dialogue to figure out who are real people v book characters- whether or not you can figure out who's speaking by the end.

 

Isobel Carmody's last book in the Obernewton series is the worst edited book I've ever read. Most of the book could be cut losing nothing at all, then it ends in a rush that does not match with the foretelling of the entire series.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
archyandmehitabel

Fifty Shades was not so much badly edited, as impossible to edit. You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ...well the saying is 'ear' but in fact dung is a better description.

 

Appallingly written, boring, misogynistic, poorly researched, naive drivel which should never have been published.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ozquoll

Fifty Shades was not so much badly edited, as impossible to edit. You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ...well the saying is 'ear' but in fact dung is a better description.

 

Appallingly written, boring, misogynistic, poorly researched, naive drivel which should never have been published.

I read about ten pages of 50 Shades when it first came out and wondered how the hell anyone could get aroused by such bad writing! It is *meant* to be erotica, isn't it?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
onetrick

Haha- 50 shades was my first thought for repetitive descriptions. It was so badly written! I know it was a twilight fan fic and twilight wasnt amazing either, but it was so much worse!

 

But I have noticed this with a number of books that I've re-read as an adult. The stories are fine, but the writing is just harder to get into...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GingerbreadWoman

 

Isobel Carmody's last book in the Obernewton series is the worst edited book I've ever read. Most of the book could be cut losing nothing at all, then it ends in a rush that does not match with the foretelling of the entire series.

 

That last book was just so incredibly disappointing. It is certainly the worst edited book I have ever finished reading. There are multiple places where the wrong character names are used, and the main character has different coloured eyes than in the rest of the series...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kimasa

My big YA editing pet peeve is when a book reads like a grouchy man yelling "YOU KIDS GET OFF MY LAWN" through the point of view of a teenager.

 

It's both poor writing and poor editing. It's especially poor editing when pages upon pages are dedicated to taking selfies. It's your job to go "We don't need to do this 8 times in the book, it adds nothing".

 

I look to awards like the Inkys where the judging panel are made up of teens, there are no shortlisted, longlisted or winners that are just pages upon pages of selfies and monologues about how phones are so much more important than parents, and it's because it's just grumpy adults who don't have a clue.

 

As far as books aimed at adults go, The Land Before Avocado by Richard Glover told a few of the anecdotes multiple times.I can't remember which ones exactly, it was a January read for me, but I remember flicking through it a few times going "I'm sure I've already read this paragraph... oh look, I did, it's in here again!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rosie28

My brother left the first Twilight book in my apartment in Tokyo years ago and I ran out of books so decided to read it. Someone really should have taken a red pen to it before it was released...could have been half the length. I got on Amazon and in magical Tokyo, had a pile of new books on my desk when I arrived at work the next morning.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements

×
×
  • Create New...