Jump to content
verde

Breastfeeding mother imprisoned

Recommended Posts

seayork2002

Why does breastfeeding allow someone off a crime/penalty?

  • Like 12

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Paddlepop

Child is 2yo so he/she wouldn't be reliant on the mum as the primary source of nutrition. The mum is being released tomorrow anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mooples

 

What can women who are breastfeeding or have breastfed do to prevent this happening again?

 

 

Not commit a crime? Seems the logical solution.

  • Like 17

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
petit_manchot

Hmmm, I'm with previous posters on this. While I agree with the point made in the article that jailing people for not paying fines is part of a bigger problem in these communities, I'm not sure that the breastfeeding argument is particularly relevant in this case.

  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Teds

Why does being poor mean people have to go to jail? If this was me, I'd have the resources to pay the fine. Part of the systemic discrimination against certain sectors of our society, and partly why so many aboriginal people end up in jail for really dumb reasons.

  • Like 32

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lallalla

On the one hand I agree with Seayork, the best way to avoid going to jail as a breast feeding mother is to not commit a crime.

 

On the other hand separating a homeless mum and her breast feeding baby (plus 4 older children) over unpaid fines seems a bit rich.

 

On a third hand (?), the baby was 2 years old, I wonder if it would have happened if the baby had been tiny (and therefore breast milk it's primary/only food source).

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kallie88

I think you're conflating issues. If she had paid her fine she would not have been separated from her children. If she had committed a murder would it be equally abhorrent that she was in jail instead of at home breastfeeding? Or would you say it was the accepted consequence for committing a crime? Jail may be a harsh penalty for unpaid fines, but that is an issue all to itself, breastfeeding or not should play no part in that discussion.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hands Up

Child is two. Breastfeeding is not a medical necessity. Vast majority of children no longer being fed at this age. The bigger issue is how aboriginal women are disproportionately affected by jailing for non payment of fines. The Senator's suggestion of collection via deductions from Centrelink payments seems much fairer.

  • Like 13

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
halcyondays

So no one sees a problem with an aboriginal woman being taken away from her young children because of about $4000 in unpaid fines over a court case involving an unregistered dog? An aboriginal person in poverty without the means to pay these fines?

I'm sure she and her family remember the stolen generation all too well.

  • Like 20

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
born.a.girl

Not commit a crime? Seems the logical solution.

 

It was a fine over an unregistered dog, which seemingly dragged on and turned into a massive amount of money.

 

 

I can't see the logic of jail under those circumstances. Surely community service is better for everyone involved.

 

A two year old would hopefully be receiving virtually all of its sustenance elsewhere, but a sudden disruption in their routine and their comforting rituals would be hard.

  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
petit_manchot

So no one sees a problem with an aboriginal woman being taken away from her young children because of about $4000 in unpaid fines over a court case involving an unregistered dog? An aboriginal person in poverty without the means to pay these fines?

I'm sure she and her family remember the stolen generation all too well.

 

I do think there are serious issues with the punishment attached to non-payment of the fine.

 

I don't think that the fact that the woman is/was breastfeeding a 2-year old is related to this much broader systemic problem. There are other valid arguments that can be made, that do not take away from the injustice of this woman's predicament, and that have more substance than 'but she is breastfeeding'.

  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mooples

 

 

It was a fine over an unregistered dog, which seemingly dragged on and turned into a massive amount of money.

 

 

I can't see the logic of jail under those circumstances. Surely community service is better for everyone involved.

 

A two year old would hopefully be receiving virtually all of its sustenance elsewhere, but a sudden disruption in their routine and their comforting rituals would be hard.

 

I agree the penalty is harsh and the treatment of Indigenous people is horrible but she should have registered her dog. An extremely minor crime of course but so easily avoided.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
purplekitty

I'd rather Belle Gibson was in jail for not ponying up the $400,000.

  • Like 41

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
~Jolly_F~

The simplistic answer is to say not get fined in the first place and if you do pay the fines.

 

But the makes it an incredibly black and white issue and it just isnt.

 

Considering that Aboriginal people are only 3% of Australia's population and in some areas of the country they make up at least 80% of the prison population. Something isnt right.

  • Like 11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lucrezia Bauble

Why does being poor mean people have to go to jail? If this was me, I'd have the resources to pay the fine. Part of the systemic discrimination against certain sectors of our society, and partly why so many aboriginal people end up in jail for really dumb reasons.

 

This.

 

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
~Kestrel~

Breastfeeding or not, it is wrong for a two year old to be forcibly separated from their primary caregiver without a very good reason.

  • Like 15

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oriental lily

Just another bit of evidence that financial hardhip as punishment is unfair and does not work ! Whatever her original 'crime' was has snowballed In to this ridiculous penalty and caused hardhip for many people . Over an unregistered dog???? Belle Gibson swindled hundreds of thousands of dollars through deceit , fraud and lies ! .never had to see the inside of a courtroom! Snubbed her nose the whole time at the justice system . The judge even kindly said she might have a mental health problem and the fine can be payed instalments . Yet this indigenous woman is incarcerated , seperated from her family , all because she is incapable of paying a much smaller fine ? Were was the compassion for her? Something seriously screwed up in his these different 'punishments' have been handled !

  • Like 20

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
verde

I suppose that means i don't really understand what a crime is. To me, separating a mother from a child is a crime. A civil matter involving a municipal fine can be considered a crime?

  • Like 11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
purplekitty

There was another Aboriginal death in custody last week.

A young man of 22.

 

That is also one of the implications of locking up people up that needs to be considered.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
~Jolly_F~

We have Murri Court in Qld. I dont know if other states have this or something similar.

 

It tries to work the Indigenous cultural side with the law side and find a middle ground to deal with certain crimes.

 

An Aboriginal elder sits on the bench with the Magistrate and helps advise them in what will best help the particular person.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ellie bean

Yes imprisonment in this case is appalling. nothing to do with breastfeeding- I'm failing to see how it would be any better if she wasn't bf.

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FuzzyChocolateToes

The punishment doesn’t fit the crime - prison for an unregistered dog seems extremely heavy handed.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lucky 2

Considering they are homeless it would be wise to continue to allow a very young child like this 2yo to have access to the breast when needed or wanted.

.

Supporting the immune system, providing comfort and security in what sounds like difficult living conditions sounds sensible.

It's bad enough separating a child from their comfort toy when it's left at Grandma's or daycare, we tend to think the world might end for the child, let alone loss of everything, mum, mum's arms, mum's breasts etc.

It's a no win situation for any child, bf or not.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Feral Grey Mare

The cost of trying her and jailing her would have been way more than the amount of the fines. Surely a small deduction from her benefit payment would have made more sense.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements

×
×
  • Create New...