Jump to content

Hospital may not offer sterilisation, termination
New Midland (WA) Health Campus run by SJOG


  • Please log in to reply
430 replies to this topic

#51 LittleListen

Posted 14 April 2012 - 03:06 PM

QUOTE (tigerdog @ 14/04/2012, 12:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It seems we agree in principle but do you have any evidence of the above?  It seems like a gross generalisation - religious people don't have the monopoly on caring!  But I guess what I meant was that religious organisations shouldn't be involved in the public system (as in the OP) as they have views which might preclude certain services being offered to the public.

Nor do I believe they should be involved in profit-making private enterprise (those greedy churches!), although at least in that case they would have the freedom to offer what they like and people can choose to take it or not.  In the public system those without the means don't have any other option and as a PP stated, religion shouldn't come into it.


I certainly wasn't saying that religious people have a monopoly on caring. I simply meant that in reference to the comment PP made about the necessity for medicine to be completely separate from religion - this is a historic relationship - not a modern issue.

The vast majority of 'private' religious-based health and welfare services in Australia run with a non-for-profit format or are part of larger umbrella organisations that do.

QUOTE (tess @ 14/04/2012, 01:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm confused. Why would teh government award the contract to a health provider if the health provider cannot provide the services that the government has deemed important?



The tender may not have specified the services that are in question here. Tenders generally have a number of specified services and key performance indicators that bidders need to quote on. They are unlikely to included every aspect of provided services.

Without religious-based health care in this country, the government would be forced to raise your taxes even further to provide entirely state-based care.

In relation to the OP - I do not think it is necessary for religious-based services to provide services that go against their moral values, regardless of the available local healthcare - that's not their concern - its a government issue to then provide complementary service alternatives such as a clinic to provide those services that are missing from the hospital services.

#52 Soontobegran

Posted 14 April 2012 - 03:10 PM

QUOTE (gingermeg @ 14/04/2012, 02:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
STBG, I was offered contraceptive advice after giving birth to DD1 at a public hospital. I was refused contraceptive advice after DD2 (like others in this thread) because the "public" hospital is run by an organisation with an anti-contraception agenda. That was denying us reproductive choice and is a completely different scenario to choosing to give birth at a private Catholic hospital.


Clearly different hospitals have different policies and I would advise everyone to ensure they know them before they book into their hospital of birth if possible.
I have only worked in obstetrics in the PUBLIC system, our hospital is a major obstetric hospital which runs under the umbrella of the Catholic church and contraceptive options are discussed and the mini pill IS prescribed.

#53 Hayleymumof3

Posted 14 April 2012 - 03:11 PM

QUOTE
When I was at one of the public hospitals in Canberra having my last baby the doctor refused to discuss contraception with me as he wasn't allowed to as the hospital is run by a Catholic organisation (in my books this constituted neglect of the hospital's duty of care to myself as the patient).


Tigerdog was this by any chance Calvery hospital?  They did the same thing to me 9 years ago after asking me if there was anything I would like to discuss before I was discharged.  I asked how soon would I be able to go on the pill and was told that he wouldn't discuss it with me because it was a Catholic hospital and it was against their religion.

#54 Mummy Em

Posted 14 April 2012 - 03:19 PM

Wow, quite a few women in this thread reporting that they were denied contraceptive advice after birth in a Catholic-run public hospital. ohmy.gif

QUOTE (soontobegran @ 14/04/2012, 02:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
They are not denied reproductive choice?
They choose to deliver in a Catholic institution with the knowledge that they will not be offered some types of contraception. They simply take control of their contraception on discharge.


It does complicate things a bit, though, if you can't go to your local public hospital. This hospital is in an area where there is another public hospital 20 mins away. It is also in a very low socio-economic area, and on the edge of a rural district. The hospital this one is replacing is now my local hospital.

When I got pregnant with dd2 I was living in a different area and we shifted house toward the end of my pregnancy, but having met my OB and midwives I stuck with the other hospital. It wasn't until I was discharged after my c/s that I realised that I wasn't going to be offered visits by the home visitting midwives because I had moved out of the catchment. I possibly could have made a fuss and got them to organise something with the other hospital, I didn't bother because I was feeling confident. But what about other women who might not feel as confident advocating for themselves? What if going to a different hospital puts them outside of the catchment for follow-up services? And what if transport is an issue for them, or their family?

I'm not sure what the answer is, but I think having people go outside of their area for healthcare is less than ideal.

#55 PatG

Posted 14 April 2012 - 03:30 PM

Am I right in thinking that all those who ran into the doctors who wouldn't discuss contraception post delivery were in Canberra?  Perhaps it is a very localised (e.g. one hospital - although if one, probably another somewhere too) issue, and that most under the catholic umbrella are more likely to be as described by STBG.

I think that if the organisation is granted the tender and provides the services as required under the agreement then they can do what they like otherwise.  So it becomes a tender allocation issue - perhaps the tender should have gone to a different organisation.  As a PP said, not all hospitals offer the same services, regardless of who runs them.  I know of hospitals which have no maternity or children's services - you have to go somewhere else if your child may need to be admitted or you might give birth soon.

#56 Soontobegran

Posted 14 April 2012 - 03:37 PM

QUOTE (Mummy Em @ 14/04/2012, 03:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm not sure what the answer is, but I think having people go outside of their area for healthcare is less than ideal.


Honestly I don't think too many of us in Australia should complain about the availablity and quality of our healthcare when in some countries women are walking for days in labour to get to their local hospital. We are brilliantly catered for in the majority of cases but just sometimes that will mean travelling a few kilometres to another facility to access a certain procedure.
As I said previously, choosing to live remotely does present problems which are not in anyway avoidable but the rest of us don't really have to travel too far for excellent free healthcare.
I did not deliver in a hospital in my area, many surgeries that family members have involved going to hospitals out of our area, it is impossible for every area to have a facility that provides absolutely every possible service available.


EFS

Edited by soontobegran, 14 April 2012 - 03:40 PM.


#57 Jenferal

Posted 14 April 2012 - 03:45 PM

I gave birth in a PRIVATE Catholic run hospital 2 years ago and was given contraceptive advice. The hospital is run by the same group who run Calvary (which has public and private patients).
Though my IVF clinic had to leave the grounds when the group took over a few years beforehand.

#58 Phasmatis angelam

Posted 14 April 2012 - 03:48 PM

QUOTE (Mummy Em @ 14/04/2012, 12:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
What do you think, should religious organisations running public hospital services be permitted to not offer certain services, as per their religious views?


I think it is perfectly reasonable for an institution to refuse to perform certain procedures or prescribe some substances - IF they are prepared to refer you on to someone who may if you so desire.  If they refuse the procedure/prescription, AND refuse you a referral, to my mind that is an abuse of power.  The question of whether the government has awarded the tender reasonably, to my mind, hinges on the question of whether services to which people might be referred are reasonably accessible.

QUOTE (tigerdog @ 14/04/2012, 12:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I don't believe in religious organisations deviating into healthcare and other non-related service areas anyway.


It's non-related from one perspective, but caring for people is, from another perspective, the Church's core business.  I don't think it can be dismissed so easily.

QUOTE (tigerdog @ 14/04/2012, 12:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It seems we agree in principle but do you have any evidence of the above?


This was asking about public healthcare having religious roots.  The first public healthcare was that given at the temples of Asclepius, the Greek god of healing.  As religious forms have shifted, the churches took over that role, and a great deal of health care was done from monasteries (you may have heard of the order of the Knights Hospitaller).  In time, it was easier to have them in separate buildings, eventually governments (often pushed by churches!) got involved, and the rest is history...

QUOTE (purplekitty @ 14/04/2012, 02:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
They don't do terminations at all,in any circumstance, as far as I know.


Not quite correct.  There's an ethical principle called the law of double effect.  It says that you can't do something bad for its own sake.  But if something bad results because you're doing something good which is more important, that's permissible.  (So, abortion to save the mother's life becomes permissible).  But abortion for reasons which would be considered less weighty would not be.


#59 PatG

Posted 14 April 2012 - 03:51 PM

STBG - I'm trying to imagine Australia if everyone who lived more than "a few kilometers" from another hospital which provided required services stopped "choosing' to live more than those "few Kilometers" away and moved closer.....

I know you were making a point in comparison to much much less fortunate places in the world but you did seem to over simplify issues faced by rural Australians.

#60 Jane Jetson

Posted 14 April 2012 - 03:54 PM

QUOTE (soontobegran @ 14/04/2012, 03:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Clearly different hospitals have different policies and I would advise everyone to ensure they know them before they book into their hospital of birth if possible.


And that's fine where there is genuine choice. In my case I'd heard rumours that the Northside public hospital did not offer contraceptive advice, and chose them anyway because I figured the Canberra Hospital was a bit far away for comfort. I was still kind of taken aback when I was refused advice even though I'd half expected it, as it seemed so out of place given the excellent care I'd otherwise received. If TCH had not existed or been much further away, I would have had no real choice.

People who live in rural and remote areas still need access to reproductive choice and particularly given that there are already significant restrictions for some people (socio-economic, cultural, distance, lack of anonymity in small towns) further restricting choice on other peoples' religious grounds is not helpful, particularly when we're talking about the possibility of emergency contraception not being offered by some hospitals.

Edited to explain myself properly.

Edited by gingermeg, 14 April 2012 - 03:57 PM.


#61 LittleListen

Posted 14 April 2012 - 04:00 PM

Thank you Ange - you clarified my point regarding historical relationship far more clearly than I could.

#62 SofaSpud

Posted 14 April 2012 - 05:27 PM

I think it is fine for hospitals to choose what services they provide. No hospital provides all services so whatever their reason for denying some services whether it be on religious grounds or financial is a decision for their administration.

Denying lifesaving care in an emergency eg a hysterectomy to a woman haemorrhaging post partum is a different story, however I'm sure this wouldn't be denied. I don't think contraceptive advice should be denied either if it is in the best interests of someones health. There is a difference between elective contraceptive procedures and duty of care.

Re religions providing health care - years ago (when my mum started nursing) most public hospitals were run by nuns, so it is nothing new that religion and healthcare are connected.

Re that link to the article posted by a PP, I did hear something about that, it surprises me that that hospital is allowed to take part in that trial given the strict regulations and ethics committees that research proposals go through before it is given the go-ahead. I definitely think thorough contraceptive advice should be given in that circumstance, even though the risks are discussed, it is negligent for that information to be witheld IMO particularly when the manufacturer specifies that 2 concurrent methods be used. Surely not forwarding manufacturers advice is leaving themselves open to all kinds of future law suits.

Also, back to the new hospital OP is referring to, who knows what other tenders were put forward, if any, perhaps they were lacking even more services.

Edited by SofaSpud, 14 April 2012 - 05:41 PM.


#63 JRA

Posted 14 April 2012 - 05:32 PM

QUOTE
STBG - I'm trying to imagine Australia if everyone who lived more than "a few kilometers" from another hospital which provided required services stopped "choosing' to live more than those "few Kilometers" away and moved closer.....


So am I.

I live in a suburb of melbourne which is far from outer suburbs. The two public hospitals close to me are: 7km away and 14km away.


I am far from complaining about that, but am intrigued by the people who have options of public hospital within a few kms from them.

#64 EsmeLennox

Posted 14 April 2012 - 05:45 PM

Do we really want a situation where public patients in public hospitals are denied services (or even offered them) on the basis of religious belief? I find that very concerning.

Do what you like in a private hospital (or school for that matter) - people actively choose to be treated there, that's not always the case with public facilities. I understand that not all procedures are offered at public hospitals, but that is usually dependent on funding/equipment/level of speciality/expertise at the hospital (for example, no one expects a small regional hospital to offer a kidney transplant, it is undersootd that some services are offered only at tertiary hospitals) etc NOT on values or morals.



#65 Canberra Chick

Posted 14 April 2012 - 05:53 PM

If it's a publicly funded hospital then no, they shouldn't be allowed to refuse Medicare-scheduled services.
Sadly the public hospital on Canberra's north side does this. It makes me incredibly angry that a woman already going through a hard time has to travel to the south side to get various procedures done.

I am of the opinion that the ACT government should have stuck to its guns and taken back the running of this hospital.

#66 Elemental

Posted 14 April 2012 - 05:55 PM

STBG I'm surprised at your comments regarding access to antenatal care - as a midwife surely you're aware of the vast disparity of services available to most of rural Australia? No, women are not required to walk 50 miles naked through the snow while pulling a plow to get to hospitals but access is hardly equitable or approaching ideal in a nation with centrally funded health care.

I have immense ethical issues with religious doctrine dictating public health in a secular society.

#67 EsmeLennox

Posted 14 April 2012 - 05:59 PM

QUOTE (Elemental @ 14/04/2012, 03:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I have immense ethical issues with religious doctrine dictating public health in a secular society.


tthumbs.gif

Oh thank dog, someone who can articulate what I'm trying to say but can't manage in my sinusitis befuddled state.



#68 Phasmatis angelam

Posted 14 April 2012 - 06:09 PM

QUOTE (Jemstar @ 14/04/2012, 05:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Do we really want a situation where public patients in public hospitals are denied services (or even offered them) on the basis of religious belief? I find that very concerning.


Can I put that question the other way, though?  Is it reasonable to demand of a member of staff that he or she be involved in providing something which they believe to be wrong?  Should the state really coerce doctors or nurses against their conscience?  That's the flip side, which I think should also be held in concern.

(Note, I say this with the disclaimer I used in my first post: if you won't do something because of your religious beliefs, I consider it an abuse of power if you won't at least refer a patient to someone who will consider it an option.  The doctor's conscience should not overrule the patient's need, but neither should the patient's need overrule the doctor's conscience).

#69 BentoBaby

Posted 14 April 2012 - 06:16 PM

I think a PRIVATE hospital should be able to do whatever they want but a PUBLIC hospital should be all inclusive and offer all services. Obviously individual doctors can make the choice to offer/not offer whatever services they personally choose in terms of their area of specialty etc

#70 canuckmel

Posted 14 April 2012 - 06:18 PM

QUOTE (Ange Vert @ 14/04/2012, 06:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Can I put that question the other way, though?  Is it reasonable to demand of a member of staff that he or she be involved in providing something which they believe to be wrong?  Should the state really coerce doctors or nurses against their conscience?  That's the flip side, which I think should also be held in concern.


It is what you sign up for when you become a doctor/nurse.

If you won't help women regardless of their reproductive choices, pick a new career.


QUOTE (Elemental @ 14/04/2012, 05:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I have immense ethical issues with religious doctrine dictating public health in a secular society.


This.

#71 SofaSpud

Posted 14 April 2012 - 06:21 PM

QUOTE (Ange Vert @ 14/04/2012, 06:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Can I put that question the other way, though?  Is it reasonable to demand of a member of staff that he or she be involved in providing something which they believe to be wrong?  Should the state really coerce doctors or nurses against their conscience?  That's the flip side, which I think should also be held in concern.


Health professionals are not allowed to let their personal beliefs interfere with the care they provide and are not (as per registration) allowed to impose their beliefs on their patiens/clients. If a nurse is personally anti abortion then it would be inappropriate for them to take a job where this would be their role.

#72 EsmeLennox

Posted 14 April 2012 - 06:21 PM

QUOTE (Ange Vert @ 14/04/2012, 04:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Can I put that question the other way, though?  Is it reasonable to demand of a member of staff that he or she be involved in providing something which they believe to be wrong?  Should the state really coerce doctors or nurses against their conscience?  That's the flip side, which I think should also be held in concern.

(Note, I say this with the disclaimer I used in my first post: if you won't do something because of your religious beliefs, I consider it an abuse of power if you won't at least refer a patient to someone who will consider it an option.  The doctor's conscience should not overrule the patient's need, but neither should the patient's need overrule the doctor's conscience).


No, I agree with you here Ange, but I think it very unlikely that in a public hospital that there wouldn't be another doctor/nurse available that the patient could be referred to.

I am uncomfortable with services being refused within a public hospital that could be reasonably expected in such a facility, I am less uncomfortable with individual doctors/nurses requesting not to be involved with certain procedures if it goes against their personal beliefs/values system, but I also think the choice to work in a public facility (or private) is different to that of the patient. You choose to work in a system (or not), the same doesn't always apply to the patient.




#73 Mummy Em

Posted 14 April 2012 - 06:31 PM

QUOTE (SofaSpud @ 14/04/2012, 05:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I think it is fine for hospitals to choose what services they provide. No hospital provides all services so whatever their reason for denying some services whether it be on religious grounds or financial is a decision for their administration.


Yes, but it is the reason for not offerring the services that concerns me.

QUOTE (Elemental @ 14/04/2012, 05:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I have immense ethical issues with religious doctrine dictating public health in a secular society.


Yes, this is what I am thinking. What if a Catholic organisation gets so large that they end up winning 3/4 of government tenders for healthcare services? We suddenly have Catholic values underpinning the majority of healthcare provision. Shouldn't we protect against that possibility?

QUOTE (Ange Vert @ 14/04/2012, 06:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Can I put that question the other way, though? Is it reasonable to demand of a member of staff that he or she be involved in providing something which they believe to be wrong? Should the state really coerce doctors or nurses against their conscience? That's the flip side, which I think should also be held in concern.


In both the articles, doctors were commenting that they were uncomfortable with with th restrictions placed on them by working within the Catholic ethos. I would think that if doctors aren't able to provide certain services they would hand those procedures over to collegues the same as they do in private practice. The majority of people working in a religious organisation won't be from that religion, as organisations are not allowed to discriminate when hiring.

#74 M1B2G

Posted 14 April 2012 - 06:45 PM

I have no problem what so ever with the private system offering services based on their belief that is their right and when you attend a private facility you do so knowing their beliefs...

I think it is far from ideal when a public hospital management contract is given to a religous organisation if the resulting outcome is removing services previously provided to the community.... The ultimate choice will be with the government as to who they award the contract to but SJOG already successfully run several private maternity hospitals in Perth

Edited by LKandsoontobe3, 14 April 2012 - 06:47 PM.


#75 ubermum

Posted 14 April 2012 - 06:50 PM

Not all hospitals can offer all services anyway, so I don't have a problem with some hospitals not offering some services. Will there be other health care providers nearby to this hospital that offer these services?




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

 

WIN a $500 Visa debit card

Are you a parent? Simply take our survey for your chance to win a $500 pre-paid VISA debit card.

Breastfeeding doesn't make you a better mum - feeding your baby does

Given my immense dislike of Hopkins and her opinions, I was genuinely shocked to discover that last week she actually said something that I agreed with.

'Toni, another baby has died': the anguish of watching governments fail our babies

It has been six years since whooping cough claimed the life of four-week-old Dana McCaffery. Her parents are angry that lessons learnt weren't enough to save other babies.

Longer breastfeeding linked to higher IQ

A study of 3500 infants has found that babies who are breastfed grow up to be more intelligent and wealthy.

The 2015 flu vaccine: what's new, who should get it

For certain members of the community, catching flu can lead to severe illness or death. A vaccination can be lifesaving.

Dealing with a nappy escape artist

I hear about the tots that have a penchant for ripping their nappies off and the odd one that even smears the brown stuff on the walls and fine home furnishings, and I shudder.

Hospital apologises for 'traumatising' baby mix-up

St Vincent's Hospital has apologised "unreservedly" for a baby mix-up that left one new mum traumatised.

Tips for flying with a baby

Travelling with kids requires a whole other set of skills - ones that I have learned through (sometimes unfortunate) trial and error.

How to stay calm in an emergency

I’m not expecting you to be as calm as you might be right now. What I mean is that if your panic levels are through the roof during a stressful situation, let’s bring them down to just under the ceiling.

Toddler gets 'drunk' after cranberry juice mix-up

A toddler was taken to hospital after a waitress served her sangria instead of cranberry juice at a US restaurant.

We need to stop using this word when we talk about childbirth

Is it shaming to point out that women are often being let down in birth?

The certificate helping parents deal with pregnancy loss

For some people, this certificate will offer a sense of validation that their child was acknowledged as being here and now gone, and will help them with life post-loss.

Grieving families give warnings after toddler deaths

Two Queensland families are grieving the loss of their toddler sons after the boys drowned in separate incidents last week.

The phenomenon of phantom pregnancy kicks

'Phantom pregnancy kicks’ are encountered by many mums months - or even years - after their pregnancy is over.

The health insurance advice you can't afford to ignore

There's one simple switch that could save you hundreds of dollars a year in private health insurance.

4D scans show how smoking affects babies still in the womb

The harmful effects of smoking during pregnancy on unborn babies may be seen in tiny movements in their faces using 4D ultrasound scans, research has found.

How to babyproof your job interview

Once upon a time, I was a fan of job interviews. That all changed after I'd switched careers, had a baby and decided to spend the first year at home with her.

Sign up to our 30 days of #PlayIQ challenge

Sign up to receive 30 amazing tips and ideas for play with baby during the month of April and submit a picture or tip on our social wall for a chance to win an amazing Fisher-Price prize pack.

The most dangerous toddler food trends

Pete Evans' paleo cookbook for kids caused a storm, but there are plenty of other unsafe food trends for babies and toddlers.

Infection killed new mum of twins

Modern medicine could not save 19-year-old Sophie Burgess who died 48 hours after giving birth to twins in the UK.

Win a Ben & Holly's Little Kingdom prize pack

To celebrate the April 1 release of Holly's Magic Wand on DVD and Digital, we are giving away five DVD packs featuring the newest installment of Ben & Holly's Little Kingdom Holly's Magic Wand and many more hours of family entertainment! Enter Now!

Special Ticket Offer, Save $8!

The Essential Baby & Toddler Show is back this April! Save $8 off the door price for a limited time only!

 
Advertisement
 
Advertisement
 
 
 

What's hot on EB

Sign up to our 30 days of #PlayIQ challenge

Sign up to receive 30 amazing tips and ideas for play with baby during the month of April and submit a picture or tip on our social wall for a chance to win an amazing Fisher-Price prize pack.

Man faces jail after giving woman abortion pill smoothie

A Norwegian man is facing jail after putting abortion pills in his ex-girlfriend's smoothie, causing her to have a miscarriage.

'He's a blessing': family of baby born without eyes

Jordy Jackson was born without eyes. He has anophthalmia, which affects one in every 100,000 babies born.

Win one of 5 Cadbury Easter Hampers

With Easter fast approaching, Cadbury are giving away 5 Cadbury Easter Hampers. Enter Now!

Super fit model Sarah Stage defends her pregnancy body

Model Sarah Stage has defended her pregnancy body after critics claimed her slim figure at eight-and-a-half months pregnant wasn't "normal".

Win a Ben & Holly's Little Kingdom and Peppa Pig prize pack

To celebrate the April 1 release of Holly's Magic Wand on DVD and Digital, Essential Baby and Entertainment One are giving away five bumper DVD packs featuring the newest installment of Ben & Holly's Little Kingdom Holly's Magic Wand and many more hours of family entertainment! Enter Now!

Why I post breastfeeding photos online

I love to take pictures of my children. In some of the pictures, my younger son is nursing.

The day I broke my baby

There are things I wish I didn't know. I wish I didn't know that companies make tiny braces, small enough to hold necks no bigger than a wrist.

The place just for dads of multiples

When a couple discovers they're expecting multiples, the dad can sometimes be almost forgotten in all the excitement and preparation. But one group offers a space just for dads of twins and higher-order multiples.

Brave mum calls for domestic violence law reform

A brave mum of two has shared details of the harrowing attacks she suffered at the hands of her partner in a bid to help other victims of domestic violence.

Why I had the new test for Down syndrome

Early last year I turned 35, and having just found out I was pregnant, I opted to have the new test for Down syndrome.

Geeky baby gear

If your family is more into Star Wars, gaming and the periodic table than most, you might want to check out these geek-chic baby items.

2015: the year of the sheep

According to the Chinese zodiac, babies born in the year of the sheep are creative and enjoy spending quiet time with their own thoughts.

Breakthrough genetic testing now available in Australia

Pregnant women will for the first time have access to locally analysed, accurate, non-invasive pre-natal genetic testing when the first Australian clinic to offer the services opens its doors next week.

Grandbabies: the babies born looking old

Not a day under 65 and a lifetime of struggle! That's the look of these newborns, who look adorably older than their real age. Social networking site Reddit recently featured user submissions of adorable grandbabies, here are our favourites.

Family kicked off flight after toddler seatbelt drama

An entire family was kicked off a Cathay Pacific flight when a misbehaving toddler refused to put his seatbelt on.

Stolen baby found after 17 years

A baby stolen from her mother's arms shortly after birth has been found through an astonishing coincidence.

53 creative pregnancy announcements

Announcing that you're expecting can be a time to express your creativity, sense of humour and imagination. Check out how other parents and parents-to-be have broken the news to friends and family.

IKEA hacks for the nursery and kids' rooms

Are you one of those that know the whole IKEA catalogue by heart? Love their stuff but want to personalise it? Here's some inspiration to help you realise the potential of IKEA furniture and fittings.

36 baby names inspired by food and drinks

A French court may have ruled out Nutella as a baby name, but that doesn't have to stop you from taking inspiration from the supermarket (or bottle shop). See what parents in the US have chosen for their delicious little ones.

Clever breastfeeding products

Check out this range of products designed to help make your breastfeeding journey more enjoyable, manageable and convenient.

 

Sign up now!

30 days of #PlayIQ challenge

Receive a daily email from Essential Baby during April with great play tips and ideas, then submit your baby at play photos to our Playwall, Instagram or Twitter for your chance to win.

 
Advertisement
 
 
Essential Baby and Essential Kids is the place to find parenting information and parenting support relating to conception, pregnancy, birth, babies, toddlers, kids, maternity, family budgeting, family travel, nutrition and wellbeing, family entertainment, kids entertainment, tips for the family home, child-friendly recipes and parenting. Try our pregnancy due date calculator to determine your due date, or our ovulation calculator to predict ovulation and your fertile period. Our pregnancy week by week guide shows your baby's stages of development. Access our very active mum's discussion groups in the Essential Baby forums or the Essential Kids forums to talk to mums about conception, pregnancy, birth, babies, toddlers, kids and parenting lifestyle. Essential Baby also offers a baby names database of more than 22,000 baby names, popular baby names, boys' names, girls' names and baby names advice in our baby names forum. Essential Kids features a range of free printable worksheets for kids from preschool years through to primary school years. For the latest baby clothes, maternity clothes, maternity accessories, toddler products, kids toys and kids clothing, breastfeeding and other parenting resources, check out Essential Baby and Essential Kids.