Jump to content

NT scan measured 2.6mm
Too close for comfort?


  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

#1 raky

Posted 18 April 2011 - 01:12 PM

Hi all
woould love your opinion on my results for the NT scan.

My bub measured 2.6mm - would you get amnio or cvs to make sure or would you be happy with the result?

my chance of having a downs bub was 1:3755

TIA Kylie

#2 Angelina Ballerina

Posted 18 April 2011 - 01:16 PM

The risk result is still very very low.
But it really depends on whether this is going to stress you out for the rest of the pregnancy.
If you think it will, then a good amnio result might save you a lot of worry.
Have a chat to your doctor about your concerns

#3 Carrie B

Posted 18 April 2011 - 02:41 PM

Your result is quite low risk so it's purely up to you if you want further testing.

#4 charlie23

Posted 18 April 2011 - 02:44 PM

If they were able to see if the nasal bone was present then I would not opt for a CVS / Amnio with a 1:3755 risk factor.

#5 julz78

Posted 18 April 2011 - 02:50 PM

I had this exact same measurement with dd2, with my bloods and age taken into consideration my ratio was 1: 900ish which was still considered low risk. I didn't consider amnio/cvs because I found the risks of these much higher than that of having a ds baby and I don't think I could terminate anyway. You result is even better than mine and I would be very happy with it. I now have a happy healthy 7 week old baby girl sitting on  my lap so don't regret my decision original.gif

#6 AnotherFeral

Posted 18 April 2011 - 02:55 PM

No I wouldn't. 1:3755 is a great result.

#7 bubs1

Posted 18 April 2011 - 03:00 PM

My measurement was 3.29mm and my risk is 1:1745. The risk is still much much lower than the risk of doing an amnio or cvs, so I've opted not to do it. The genetic councellor was totally happy with the result though and said I'm low risk. Maybe speak to the genetic councellor and see what they think about it.

#8 jules77

Posted 18 April 2011 - 03:00 PM

The risks involved with further testing is actually higher than the risk of having a child with DS.

Don't just take the NT measurement on it's own as an indicator for DS - that's why the BT's are done as well.

My bub had a NT measurement of 2.9mm and with the combined BT, this amounted to a risk of around 1:400.

This was still considered a low risk and my OB recommended no further testing.

My healthy and happy 19mth old is the result!



#9 BabyHopeful

Posted 18 April 2011 - 03:19 PM

DS2 had a NT of 5.4mm with a risk of 1:30. We opted to have a CVS done which came back all clear.

With your risk ratio I wouldn't have a CVS, and would only have an amnio if you feel you need it to put your mind at ease.

HTH

#10 busy_bee

Posted 18 April 2011 - 03:26 PM

Our NT measured 3.2mm.......OB said while 'a little high' he doesn't get 'too concerned' until over 3.5mm + with other blood tests.

As it turned out with the blood tests even with the NT at 3.2 the risks were less than the age based risks anyway (can't remember actual number).

Does your results give this info? ie a basline line 'age based risk of 1:xyz' and then your actual risk based on bloods/NT of 1:abc?

You may find that your risk is lower than the age based average risk anyway



#11 smithsholidayroad

Posted 18 April 2011 - 06:33 PM


Hi there,

It is a difficult decision to make and one that only you and your partner can make. I also think a lot lies in what you would do with those results as such.

With my daughter I had a risk factor of 1:99 with a 3.2 measurement.

This time I had a 1.8 fold and a 1:375 risk.

I chose an amnio first time but this time did not as it was not recommended.

Bron


Hi there,

It is a difficult decision to make and one that only you and your partner can make. I also think a lot lies in what you would do with those results as such.

With my daughter I had a risk factor of 1:99 with a 3.2 measurement.

This time I had a 1.8 fold and a 1:375 risk.

I chose an amnio first time but this time did not as it was not recommended.

Bron

#12 Minimouse27

Posted 18 April 2011 - 08:00 PM

Hi OP

What gestation are you at? I remember at our NT (we were 13w3d) we got a fold of 2.3mm and the doc/sonographer person said it was fine. He said the "upper" end of normal was 2.8mm, so your fold of 2.6mm is within normal. I think your odds are great, which take into account the bloods also :-)

Of course, it's a decision between you and your partner ultimately...

ETA- Pregnancy brain! I just saw your ticker. Definitely with your gestation (13w4d) you would expect a bigger fold than someone at 11w6d for example, so I think you are definitely well within normal original.gif

Edited by ninack, 18 April 2011 - 08:02 PM.


#13 pitzinoodles

Posted 18 April 2011 - 08:03 PM

Just another way of looking at it...
Your risk is 1:3755 the risk of cvs is 1:50 so if everyone with that risk had a cvs over 70 would lose a normal baby and 1 would find out they had a baby with downs.

If you opt for amnio the risk is 1:200 so following the same logic 18 would lose a normal baby and 1 would have downs.

Just another way of looking at the same numbers.

Good luck with your decision

#14 baby*girl

Posted 18 April 2011 - 08:06 PM

I would not. However, I would be quite happy to have and raise a DS child.  

Good luck with your decision

#15 Soontobegran

Posted 18 April 2011 - 08:46 PM

2.6mm is within the normal range of Nuchal folds and combined with your great numbers I do not think you should worry at all.
Lots of good luck original.gif

#16 BabyHopeful

Posted 19 April 2011 - 07:12 AM

QUOTE (pitzinoodles @ 18/04/2011, 08:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Just another way of looking at it...
Your risk is 1:3755 the risk of cvs is 1:50 so if everyone with that risk had a cvs over 70 would lose a normal baby and 1 would find out they had a baby with downs.

If you opt for amnio the risk is 1:200 so following the same logic 18 would lose a normal baby and 1 would have downs.

Just another way of looking at the same numbers.

Good luck with your decision


Not sure whare you got this information but I have never heard those odds for a CVS before!  What a load of crap!  The risk is generally stated as 1:100 for a CVS but it depends where you go, most have a much less risk ratio.

#17 city*reader

Posted 19 April 2011 - 07:25 AM

I've heard CVS is 1:50 too.  Maybe different places give a different risk as I've also heard 1:100.  But then I've heard everything from 1:100 to 1:200 or even less for amnio.  I don't think an exact risk factor can be given for those... a lot of it depends on skill and experience of the person doing it.

#18 pitzinoodles

Posted 19 April 2011 - 02:26 PM

QUOTE
Not sure whare you got this information but I have never heard those odds for a CVS before! What a load of crap! The risk is generally stated as 1:100 for a CVS but it depends where you go, most have a much less risk ratio.
QUOTE


And where do you get your information from?

#19 Soontobegran

Posted 20 April 2011 - 12:15 AM

The risk of CVS is 1:100-200, definitely not 1:50.

#20 the4rugrats

Posted 20 April 2011 - 04:07 AM

Like pps have said, further testing depends on what you want to do with the results, and is this something you will stress over for the rest of the pregnancy. That's something only you and your partner can decide.  If I got those odds (which are better than mine were) I wouldn't worry.
As for me I was considered low risk, NF 2.0mm, 1-550ish, ultrasound normal, nasal bone present, I wasnt given an option for further testing or knew anything about it either.... DD2 has down syndrome (and no way on this earth would I want her any differently shes my delight!). This time I have chosen not to do any testing, no NT, no amnio or CSV I will not abort regardless of results. So for me it would have been pointless having them done (not to mention the money it costs) as DH and I are both happy with whatever the outcome will be.

Edited by the4rugrats, 20 April 2011 - 07:23 PM.


#21 lr4

Posted 20 April 2011 - 04:52 AM

My sons measurement was the same I was told high risk for chromosomal abnormalities 1:200 and low risk for down syndrome 1:5000. I did have the amnio and it come back fine.

#22 rnflorenzo

Posted 20 April 2011 - 05:00 AM

My risk was 1:516 my sons measurement was 3.0. I didn't get any testing done and all came out clear.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

 

Mum's message to son after Manchester attack

The horrific terrorist attack in Manchester, killing 22 people and injuring many others, including children, has impacted people throughout the world.

Bonds announces new personalised Zippy onesies

Now you can have your baby or toddler's name printed on their Bonds Zippys.

Mum's warning about Owlet monitor after baby receives burn

A mum has taken to Facebook to warn parents of the dangers of a popular baby monitor after her daughter sustained a burn to her foot.

The new advice on when to give juice to young children

Children under the age of one should not be given fruit juice, according to new advice issued by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

'Mummy, put your phone away': one mum's wake-up call

One of the weirdest things about your little kids getting older, I find, is when they start to be able to hold full conversations with you.

Aspirin being used to treat pre-eclampsia

Aspirin and early detection are helping to save the lives of Australian women and babies at risk of dying from the pregnancy complication pre-eclampsia.

Postnatal depletion: what is it and how can we recover?

Some mums are left physically and emotionally depleted, with nothing left to give, long after giving birth.

'Flushing' blocked fallopian tubes can improve fertility, study finds

A technique that effectively "unblocks" a woman's fallopian tubes by flushing them with liquid to help her conceive has been used for decades, with varying levels of success. Now a study has confirmed that the method significantly improves fertility, and that a certain type of fluid – one that is oil-based rather than water-based – shows strong results.

Watch these pregnant mothers make their bellies disappear

Chances are you've heard of body pump, but have you heard of belly pump?

The initiative to help job-hunting mums explain the 'resume gap'

It's a common problem faced by mums returning to work after an extended period of maternity leave. How do I account for the gap that years at home caring for babies has left in my resume?

Every parent will relate to this dad's hilariously messy 'pooplosion' tale

Make sure you aren't eating while reading this post.

 
Advertisement
 

Top 5 Articles

Advertisement
 
 
 

From our network

Mum tips to keep your pre-baby budget in check

Money might be funny in a rich man's world (or so ABBA told us), but for the rest of us it's a major consideration – particularly before having a baby.

5 easy ways to make your maternity leave last longer

Maternity leave is a special time for you, your partner and your new little bundle. The last thing you want is for financial worries to stand in the way of that joy.

10 ways to keep your 'buying for baby' costs down

Becoming a parent is full of surprises – not least of all finding out that, for such small beings, babies cause a lot of chaos and expense.

5 ways to prepare to go from two incomes to one

Here are some ideas for getting that budget in shape, ready for being a one income family.

 

Baby Names

Need some ideas?

See what names are trending this year.

 
Advertisement
 
 
Essential Baby and Essential Kids is the place to find parenting information and parenting support relating to conception, pregnancy, birth, babies, toddlers, kids, maternity, family budgeting, family travel, nutrition and wellbeing, family entertainment, kids entertainment, tips for the family home, child-friendly recipes and parenting. Try our pregnancy due date calculator to determine your due date, or our ovulation calculator to predict ovulation and your fertile period. Our pregnancy week by week guide shows your baby's stages of development. Access our very active mum's discussion groups in the Essential Baby forums or the Essential Kids forums to talk to mums about conception, pregnancy, birth, babies, toddlers, kids and parenting lifestyle. Essential Baby also offers a baby names database of more than 22,000 baby names, popular baby names, boys' names, girls' names and baby names advice in our baby names forum. Essential Kids features a range of free printable worksheets for kids from preschool years through to primary school years. For the latest baby clothes, maternity clothes, maternity accessories, toddler products, kids toys and kids clothing, breastfeeding and other parenting resources, check out Essential Baby and Essential Kids.