Jump to content

Town Planning - how important are backyards?


  • Please log in to reply
40 replies to this topic

#1 *LucyE*

Posted 23 February 2013 - 08:14 AM

I was reading this article this morning and it made me think.

QUOTE
‘‘If you look at any new Australian suburb. It is dramatic. It jumps out at you. Up until the 1980s it is all one thing - it is all trees,’’ he said.
‘‘By the end of the 1990s, it is all roof to roof.’’
He said any city needed backyards and Brisbane was no different.
‘‘Firstly, green space around buildings and housing is very important, it has a definite function,’’ Professor Hall said.
He said backyards absorbed stormwater, cooled homes and increased biodiversity.
‘‘So it has a very important role for the community as a whole and that is all in addition to all the recreational advantages and also the outlook from houses.’’
The solution was residents must ask local councils to demand that small blocks of land were not ‘‘covered’’ by large homes, he argued.
Professor Hall said only 50 per cent of a block should be covered by a house and the people of Brisbane should be debating the issue.


I live regionally on acreage so I love having my space and gardening. I can understand others who don't enjoy or have time to garden would prefer to have less yard maintenance. I can understand them wanting a freehold block rather than a unit as well.

I think it is too rigid to make a blanket rule about the percentage of land that must not be built upon. Times do change, populations grow and lifestyles evolve. It's important to have green space but that can be created as shared public areas. It doesn't have to be private space that causes anxiety for home owners and excludes others from using it.

What do you think?

Edited by *LucyE*, 23 February 2013 - 08:15 AM.


#2 BetteBoop

Posted 23 February 2013 - 08:44 AM

I would prefer high density living confined to a particular geographical area than the relentless urban sprawl which is destroying more and more of the natural landscape every year.

Regardless, trees serve a genuine purpose in suburbia. Most importantly, they give us cleaner air.

Developers are short sighted and incredibly greedy though. If they squeeze another house in there, they will and councils allow it because developers and local councils are often the same people.

We continue to wreak total destruction on the natural environment until it's inhospitable to any life other than human, and even that's debatable. It's incredibly depressing.



#3 kpingitquiet

Posted 23 February 2013 - 09:00 AM

I think it depends. Backyards are very important if there are crappy community greenspaces and recreational areas. Less so if you have fantastic parks, good public transit (less need for space to park/service cars), lots of recreational activities.

Living in suburban ADL, I'd go flipping nuts without a decent backyard. We spend half our life in that yard. Living in NYC I was fine with only a balcony to call my own because I had the vast and awesome Prospect Park only 2 avenues away and could walk to a zillion other activities.

I think Aussies need to embrace multi-story living. Same (if not more) living space with a much smaller footprint, allowing for more greenspace.

San Francisco is probably my ideal design for urban dwellings. Multi-story, high-density, no front yards but serviceable backyards (at least big enough for bbqs, paddling pools, small veggie patches, and a doggy bathroom), fantastic public transit, and TONS of public nature/recreation space. Similar setups work well in many US and European cities without everyone trading in private homes for apartments.

#4 Sentient Puddle

Posted 23 February 2013 - 09:11 AM

We live on close to 1000 square metres in suburbia - but all the older homes not renovated are being demolished to put up multi density occupancies.  Some of these are 3 stories (housing up to 11 units) and have no backyards.  They are also getting rid of most of the existing trees, which is the feature of the suburb - which is a great shame!  However we are on a couple of train lines, close to a transport and shopping hub, close to both private and public hospitals and many, many schools.  It is a much better place to be housing people than out in the scrub - increasing urban sprawl, where no amenities exist and building McMansions with touching rooflines.  

I also think that the pp's are correct - we can live without backyards but we need our urban environment set up in such a way so we can access parks and shared community spaces.  We also need things like footpaths and bus routes/cycle paths in order to get to such shared spaces.  Not many developments that I know in Aus are embracing such principles.

#5 ~Supernova~

Posted 23 February 2013 - 09:15 AM

I'd go nuts without a decent sized backyard. Both of my kids spend the majority of the day outside. I'm also happy to live in a smaller house to attain this.

High density living, with no backyard, and living in your neighbours lap, does not appeal to me on any level.

#6 Squeekums Da Feral

Posted 23 February 2013 - 09:18 AM

Link wouldnt work on my phone, so basing answe on quoted part.

While I dont think it should be a blanket rule on how much is left as land and house size, I personally could never live in a house with no yard.
I hate these new houses where they squeeze 3 houses on what was a 1 house with yard property.
Concrete Shoebox comes to mind. They look alike, no yard, blerg
NMS
My idea of hell is apartments and smell my sh*t closeness in houses.

#7 kpingitquiet

Posted 23 February 2013 - 09:24 AM

I should clarify, by embracing multi-story living, I don't mean apartments, necessarily. Rather 2-3 story single family homes offering 200+ sqm of living space with 67-100sqm footprint, vs sprawling 200+sqm footprint single-story homes.

#8 poppy_star

Posted 23 February 2013 - 10:49 AM

QUOTE
He said backyards absorbed stormwater, cooled homes and increased biodiversity.


This pretty much sums up why houses need yards, doesn't really have much to do whether people want to garden etc.  Yes I firmly believe that dwellings should restricted to a percentage footprint.  I hate houses that cover more than 75% of a block, they are nasty blight on the landscape.

Edited by poppy_star, 23 February 2013 - 10:50 AM.


#9 CountryFeral

Posted 23 February 2013 - 11:02 AM

QUOTE (kpingitquiet @ 23/02/2013, 10:24 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I should clarify, by embracing multi-story living, I don't mean apartments, necessarily. Rather 2-3 story single family homes offering 200+ sqm of living space with 67-100sqm footprint, vs sprawling 200+sqm footprint single-story homes.


Yes.  I lived in London for several years and the Georgian terraces were great.  

Small back yard, but still big enough for some trees and a BBQ - but with large communal parks everywhere.


I live out in the sticks on acreage - but in my former life as a city dweller I lived in the inner city - soulless suburbs with cheek by jowl McMansions taking up the entire block is my idea of hell - and a social disaster.

#10 kpingitquiet

Posted 23 February 2013 - 11:17 AM

Exactly, countrymel. The London, Georgetown, NYC (brownstones), San Fran style of urban housing can be stunning and very good for high-density living.

I get that in previous eras it wasn't wise to have a 2nd story in much of Australia due to the physics of heat and a lack of cooling, but new homes almost all have ducted cooling in our area so it really shouldn't be an issue anymore.

#11 Guest_bottle~rocket_*

Posted 23 February 2013 - 11:17 AM

I agree with the author.

Suburbs full of large houses with tiny backyards are awful, apart from  the environmental problems associated with them.  Human beings need green spaces to thrive.

We can't all live in single story houses on quarter acre blocks as we did in the past, but Mcmansions are not the solution.  Good urban design is very important.  Medium density housing near urban centres with good transport links and plenty of shared open space is the way to go.


#12 GenWhy

Posted 23 February 2013 - 11:21 AM

I love Perth and especially the older suburbs where they have huge back yards and Jacaranda trees. I dislike the new suburbs and practice of knocking down all the old houses to put a giant house on it basically touching the fence lines. I'm all for progress and agree that a lot of the old homes with big yards do need to be demolished for safety/structural reasons. But it annoys me that instead of a new house going on the block, the council allows it to be subdivided. Most of these blocks now have zero backyard as there's a triplex apartment built on what used to be a 3x1 homesite.

Especially in the far northern suburbs (eg Burns Beach, Jindalee, Butler) and some of the brand new ones south side (eg Yangebup) I find it very depressing to see entire suburbs of exactly the same house with roof tops almost touching. It's heading the same way in the far north of the state with new land releases in Karratha etc all on tiny little blocks.

I believe it's greed pure and simple. The government needs to release land that's divided into bigger sizes - trying to find anything bigger than a 450-500sqm lot is exceedingly difficult here. Considering it used to be the norm to have a 700-1200sqm lot, with a smaller house on it, that's a big difference.

The other thing to consider is the impact of migrants. A lot of people I've spoken to about my hatred of no backyards and tiny lots have looked at me like I'm mad. Perth has a very high number of immigrants from the UK and the Sudan, Somalia etc. The blocks/houses seem normal or big to them.

Another thing to consider is caveats on certain areas stating no second stories can be added. This sometime leaves little choice but to put a 4x2 on a small block leaving virtually no yard.

We are currently living in the country and have an average house with virtually no yard. All the other houses in town have yards I truly envy. Mine is far too small for kids to play in and it's too hot up here for the kids to be down at the park during the day. Another example of new housing being released without taking family needs into consideration.

I'd LOVE for the bigger blocks to come back!

#13 cinnabubble

Posted 23 February 2013 - 11:23 AM

I'd rather high density living with lots of amenities than those drive-in-drive-out suburbs where you can't even walk to the corner shop for milk or to the bus stop. Acreage is like my worst nightmare.

#14 LynnyP

Posted 23 February 2013 - 11:25 AM

Greenspace is important, for sure.  But it doesn't need to be broken into small chunks and used only by the people with a key to that front door.  Sure often I would like a backyard so I could send her out without being involved but within 100m from my front door I have a beach, two big recreational spaces with playgrounds and a bit of "bush".  Within 500m I have a massive lake surrounded by park with playgrounds and bike paths and paying space as well as another big park with tennis courts, cricket pitch, cricket nets, basketball/netball hoops.

Edited by LynnyP, 23 February 2013 - 11:26 AM.


#15 girltribe4

Posted 23 February 2013 - 11:31 AM

We did pretty much fill our block but we are in a very strict council area where a 2 storey house would never have got approval , as it was our 5 bed had to look like a 2 bed cottage with add ons rolleyes.gif
We have a huge oval across the road , are surrounded by parks and the beach a short tram ride away .
The girls don't use our ''garden'' atm as its still mainly full of building rubble , but one day I am hoping it will lovely .

#16 Ruf~Feral~es

Posted 23 February 2013 - 11:40 AM

I think to make high density housing work for families, many of us will need to change our parenting styles, to reduce the helicopter parenting that is taking over.

I grew up in a street of 1/4 acre blocks.  "Normal" suburbia in Sydney.  We backed on to bushland, there was a big park and more bushland a few streets away.  From the ages of 6 or 7, we were out on our bikes, roaming the bush, making cubbies etc.  And when we were not, we could play cricket in the backyard, swim, etc etc etc.

None of the kids around our area today are allowed out to the park without a parent until they seem to be 10 or older.  We see families out on bike rides (which is great), but kids can't just jump on their bikes and ride to a friends house around the corner.

Yes, there is more traffic, I suppose.  But I don't know that the horrors of what might happen at the park are as real as the parents seem to think.  I would let my DD go over with some friends, but none of her friends are allowed.

The reality when you have several kids is that you cannot spend the whole day supervising them in public spaces. A few hours - fine.  But for them to get out for the whole day just isn't possible, the way it was when I was growing up. So they either need more space in their gardens to play, or we need to try to relax and let them go enjoy the open spaces on their own..... at least a little bit more than we do now.

#17 poppy_star

Posted 23 February 2013 - 11:41 AM

I believe the article is talking specifically about a certain type of zoned residential suburbs.  Not whether developments high medium or low density.  The point being made is, new suburbs of low density living allow huge houses to be built on small blocks, leaving very little yard.  So many people buying 400 sm blocks and squeezing on a biggest house possible. This is what he is telling us we should be challenging.

#18 FleaFork

Posted 23 February 2013 - 11:42 AM


QUOTE (poppy_star @ 23/02/2013, 11:49 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
This pretty much sums up why houses need yards, doesn't really have much to do whether people want to garden etc.  Yes I firmly believe that dwellings should restricted to a percentage footprint.  I hate houses that cover more than 75% of a block, they are nasty blight on the landscape.

I agree. Backyards are important to prevent flooding. Many people don't realise this in their quest to build their McMansion.









#19 I'm Batman

Posted 23 February 2013 - 11:57 AM

Did you know children in london in the 50's were getting rickkets from not enough exposure to natural light.

Yes I think it should be limited. Yes I think the land should be used more efficantly. Yes I think apartments should have verandas and use the space better.

There is a new suburb, I drive past, Jordan Springs, you can literally jump from roof to roof, the houses are a about 1m from the back fence. I fail to see how they would have any natural light. Its not normal natural or healthy.

I would much prefer if houses were architect designed with natural lightwells and backyard space. Its abnormal to live shoved up against your fence.

#20 babatjie

Posted 23 February 2013 - 12:11 PM

First world problem. Have you seen how close shacks are too eaxh other, with no real windows?

I think us on small blocks in newer developments will survive, and so will the enviroment. Australia is massive. All new developments I have seen replace plus extra trees that are removed, create water areas for native animals and birds, and have large green areas. Also, all homes need to be built five to eight stars for energy rating, have a rainwater tank that is plumbed back to the house, tinted windows etc. Much smarter building tecniques that were used in the older suburbs, where Northern hemispere, cold area technques were used. Most blocks are divided to be North/South facing where possible.

#21 LynnyP

Posted 23 February 2013 - 12:20 PM

I'm sitting in my apartment in front of my floor to ceiling sliding doors and half height many windows, flooded with natural light, contemplating my unnatural state.  If it wasn't raining we would have spent a couple of hours at the huge complex playing tee ball, then spent some time at the beach or at the lake.

Greenspace doesn't have to be sequestered!  Living in an apartment or a medium/high density dwelling doesn't mean a dark box shared only with rats and potato peelings!

#22 FeralBob!

Posted 23 February 2013 - 12:20 PM

QUOTE (kpingitquiet @ 23/02/2013, 10:24 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I should clarify, by embracing multi-story living, I don't mean apartments, necessarily. Rather 2-3 story single family homes offering 200+ sqm of living space with 67-100sqm footprint, vs sprawling 200+sqm footprint single-story homes.

Absolutely. Terrace housing has been sadly overlooked in this country and it really is a very economical and worthwhile form of housing when it's properly planned. It can also give surprisingly high densities while still allowing greater privacy and access to the outdoors than high rise apartments.

I firmly believe that it is better to have a good amount of public green space that is overlooked and shared among a number of houses. One of the best examples of this I have seen was in Ireland, where one housing development of terrace style housing was sited around a green area. Each house had a small private area, that opened up to the larger communal area. Because the back fences were only 3 feet high you could see what was going on without leaving the house, and kids had a contained area in which to play.

Communal open space has other benefits as well, in that by forcing people out of the house , you have a greater chance to meet your neighbours and develop a community.

#23 *LucyE*

Posted 23 February 2013 - 12:42 PM

QUOTE
QUOTE
He said backyards absorbed stormwater, cooled homes and increased biodiversity.

This pretty much sums up why houses need yards, doesn't really have much to do whether people want to garden etc. Yes I firmly believe that dwellings should restricted to a percentage footprint. I hate houses that cover more than 75% of a block, they are nasty blight on the landscape.

But these environmental concerns can still be incorporated into public green spaces.  They don't have to be in tiny, segmented tiny backyards.

I do believe more thought has to be put into public green spaces though.  A patch of grass on land that won't sell doesn't cut it.

I like the idea of more medium density housing with more public green space and amenities rather than mindless urban sprawl.

#24 FeralBob!

Posted 23 February 2013 - 01:01 PM

QUOTE (*LucyE* @ 23/02/2013, 01:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I do believe more thought has to be put into public green spaces though.  A patch of grass on land that won't sell doesn't cut it.

I like the idea of more medium density housing with more public green space and amenities rather than mindless urban sprawl.

No, open space must be designed as part of the subdivision so that it can be easily accessed without crossing roads, or with road crossing that are safe for pedestrians. It needs to be overlooked by a number of houses, to provide passive surveillance and reduce the possibility of anti social behaviour. Most importantly, it needs to cater for all sections of the community, not just primary school aged children. We hve some fantastic playgrounds in this country, but they are by and large only designed for primary school aged kids. There are few spaces that have been designed with teenagers in mind, which means that they become alienated from their surrounds. And we need to design for the elderly as well, with places to walk and sit.

Not every park needs to do this, but at least some of these elements should be present in smaller parks and all of them in larger district parks. It's hardly rocket science, but it does mean a big shift towards putting green spaces at the heart of subdivision design, instead of being thought about only after the housing.

#25 I'm Batman

Posted 23 February 2013 - 01:08 PM

Living in a city with greenspace is different to living in a far flung suburb where parks are a meeting point for anti social behaviour.

some parks are just open grass, thats it. filled with rubbish. It doesnt offer much,




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

 

Special offer: The Baby & Toddler Show 2014

At The Baby & Toddler Show, you?ll find everything you need to get ready for your new arrival and guide you through the early weeks and years of parenting.

An open letter to Tony Abbott: please salvage our super

We face financial ruin, but most of us don?t realise it. If we don?t act together to salvage our superannuation, I have no doubt the new GFC will be the Girls? Financial Crisis.

'I'm happy to know I'm changing lives': surrogate mum of two

I know that once the baby is born, I will focus on the gift I have given, and watch the parents with their new child. I can't wait for that day.

Birth trauma and the issue of informed consent

There is a perception that women should just be happy they have a healthy baby in their arms. But for women who experienced birth trauma, there's a lot more to it.

Tips for managing pollen allergies and hayfever

They're simple tips, but they can have a big impact on those who suffer from hayfever and pollen allergies.

Ada Nicodemou shares tribute to her stillborn baby

Just over one month since Ada Nicodemou and her husband lost their second son, the Home and Away star has shared a touching poem for her baby.

Mum causes stir breastfeeding on train

?To the woman breastfeeding her kid on the train. Seriously! On the train?" began the letter of complaint.

10 things they don?t tell you about being pregnant

As I slowly waddle my ever-changing pregnant body towards the finishing line of my due date, it?s becoming increasingly clear there are a lot of things they just don?t tell you about pregnancy.

Overcoming a fear of the dark

A toddler's fear of the dark is very normal, but there are ways parents can help children through this stage in their development.

Kids, TV and movies: how young is too young?

It seems you don't have to throw the TV and iPad out the window - it all boils down to moderation, supervision and interaction.

Video: Baby's first birthday is a special day for mum, too

?A baby?s first birthday is also mum?s first birthday.?

The day Supernanny came to tea

Prince William's favourite celebrity child trainer Jo Frost puts Bryony Gordon and her toddler through their paces.

The words I hated hearing as new mum

It was less than a week after my son was born that I first heard it - from my mother.

To the pharmacist who sold me baby formula

On the rare occasion I catch sight of you at school, or around town, I think back to our earliest exchange. I?m sure you have no recollection of it at all.

Babies may benefit from autism therapy

Children showing signs of autism don't usually receive early intervention until well into toddlerhood or later, but a new study suggests infants with symptoms of the developmental disorder might benefit from therapy from as early as six months.

Knatalye and Adeline born with an everlasting bond

Knatalye Hope and Adeline Faith are a lot like any other identical twin girls, but there is one dramatic difference: they're joined at the chest and shares several internal organs.

The question this dad wishes he'd asked his wife

I should have seen that my wife wasn't the same person I'd fallen in love with, but we were both too focused on simply trying to get by.

Why we should talk about the deaths of the Hunt children

The deaths are too horrible even to think about. Yet we owe it to the children - Fletcher, Mia and Phoebe Hunt - to think long and hard about it all.

Baby dies of meningococcal weeks after vaccine application denied

A six-month-old girl has died from meningococcal disease just weeks after an application for government funding of a vaccine for the most deadly strain of the virus was rejected.

Finding the right balance when playing with your kids

Being too involved in our children?s play and not allowing our kids enough free time for unstructured activities can mean our kids miss out on the value that play offers.

Creative DIY light shades

The Pop Light light shade comes in a flat pack already made - it's up to you to design it as you'd like.

The battle of iParenting versus imagination

Have we forgotten how to be imaginative, resourceful parents?

Why movement is so important for your baby's growth

Letting your child move as much as possible in the early years ? using all senses, engaging in the real world, preferably outside ? will help them grow up healthier, smarter, calmer and stronger.

Download now: Essential Kids Activity Finder app

Got bored kids? Quickly find the best activities for kids wherever you are in Australia with the Essential Kids app.

 
Advertisement
 
Advertisement
 
 
 

What's hot on EB

Special offer: The Baby & Toddler Show 2014

At The Baby & Toddler Show, you?ll find everything you need to get ready for your new arrival and guide you through the early weeks and years of parenting.

Losing yourself to motherhood

While watching your baby grow into a unique little person is exciting and wondrous, the intensity of meeting everyone else?s needs can ever so sneakily overtake your own needs for self-care.

Tearing during delivery: the facts

Almost all women will experience bruising, grazing or tearing after a vaginal birth. Depending on the degree of tearing, there are various treatments available.

6 tips for a day out with a baby and toddler

Outings can be lots of fun with the kids, but there are inevitable challenges. Here's some information about days out to help you be a little more prepared.

Why I invited a dozen people to watch my son's birth

I sent invitations on burgundy scrapbooking paper stamped with a field of poppies, and told each person why I wanted him or her there. I warned that there would be nudity.

Getting labour started: tips for a natural induction

When your baby?s due date comes and goes without so much as a pop - let alone a bang - it can be disheartening. Mums and a doula share their stories of natural inductions.

7 mistakes old hands make with new babies

As I sat across the table from my friend ? me, a seasoned mother of three; her, a brand new mum ? I thought of all the mistakes an old-hand parent can make when visiting a newborn baby.

That's my boy: a dad's diary of the first 4 months

Unbearable anxiety, unspeakable joy, constant exhaustion and bouts of frustration ... The many shocks of first-time fatherhood resound in a dad's diary of his son's early months.

One of the most important things a new mum can do

Finances may not be as cute as a newborn, but with many women?s working arrangements changing post-baby, monetary matters need attention too.

Dying mum saves baby with last breath

Dying from a gunshot wound, Jessica Arrendale used the last of her energy to hide her baby from her killer.

Personalised baby gifts

We've scoured the internet to find gorgeous personalised keepsakes and nursery decor to record baby name and dates. They make great gifts for christenings, name days and birthdays! (All prices in AU.)

 

Reader offer

2 FOR 1 TICKET OFFER

For Shopping, For Advice, For Baby & You. Enjoy a special day out with fabulous shopping from over 200 brands, leading parenting experts offering advice on a range of topics, and amazing children?s entertainment

 
Advertisement
 
 
Essential Baby and Essential Kids is the place to find parenting information and parenting support relating to conception, pregnancy, birth, babies, toddlers, kids, maternity, family budgeting, family travel, nutrition and wellbeing, family entertainment, kids entertainment, tips for the family home, child-friendly recipes and parenting. Try our pregnancy due date calculator to determine your due date, or our ovulation calculator to predict ovulation and your fertile period. Our pregnancy week by week guide shows your baby's stages of development. Access our very active mum's discussion groups in the Essential Baby forums or the Essential Kids forums to talk to mums about conception, pregnancy, birth, babies, toddlers, kids and parenting lifestyle. Essential Baby also offers a baby names database of more than 22,000 baby names, popular baby names, boys' names, girls' names and baby names advice in our baby names forum. Essential Kids features a range of free printable worksheets for kids from preschool years through to primary school years. For the latest baby clothes, maternity clothes, maternity accessories, toddler products, kids toys and kids clothing, breastfeeding and other parenting resources, check out Essential Baby and Essential Kids.