Jump to content

Duty of care and doctors


  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

#1 Erma Gerd

Posted 07 February 2013 - 03:14 PM

I've just been reading some articles about this case, and I can't get my head around it at all.

The article in Australian Doctor on the case also says:
QUOTE
The court heard evidence that Mr Almario, who also suffered diabetes and had a history of alcohol problems, had repeatedly failed to follow health and management advice from his previous doctors. He had previously been referred to a specialist weight control clinic but success in managing his weight was only short term.

The key aspect of the court's judgement was that although Dr Varipatis had raised the possibility of bariatric surgery with Mr Almario, the GP was insufficiently "proactive" in managing the patient.

The judge said: “...I am satisfied that given Mr. Almario's previous failed attempts to lose weight by conservative means, a more dramatic or robust intervention was required, especially because of the knowledge of Dr Varipatis about bariatric surgery. And I find that it was negligent for Dr Varipatis not to have made this referral by about the middle of 1998.”

Justice Campbell added: “[It] was not sufficient simply to make the option known to Mr Almario, for what it’s worth, and then leave him to take it or leave it, which I find Dr Varipatis did. More pro-active involvement was required.”


Granted there probably is more to this than reported, but how pro-active do you expect your GP to be? Is it enough that they run through options, or should they be firmly prodding you towards what they recommend?

#2 Ally'smum

Posted 07 February 2013 - 03:28 PM

I would hope there is more to that story, otherwise I would expect the doctor to win on appeal.

My FIL is obese and no one, not his wife, children, doctor, anyone has been able to do anything about it, because he doesn't want to do anything about it.

I think all the doctor should do is outline the risks, provide further information and recommend a course of action. If the patient doesn't follow up that is no one's fault but their own.



#3 Phasmatis angelam

Posted 07 February 2013 - 03:30 PM

Isn't that sort of "firm prodding" exactly what has women up in arms about obstetric care?  Why is this any different?

FWIW, I have no problem with a doctor saying, "These are your options, this is the one I strongly recommend," but it's a very fine line to walk.

#4 purplekitty

Posted 07 February 2013 - 03:39 PM

If you look into the GP's background you can see there is probably a lot more to this story.
He was reprimanded in 2009 for treating a patient with renal disease with high dose IV Vit C.
Conditions were put on his practice.

The decision will still possibly have unfortunate repercussions for medical care.

#5 FeralZombieMum

Posted 07 February 2013 - 03:41 PM

I think people have a duty of care to themselves and should not expect to be exempt from taking responsibility about their own health.

If his wife did all the shopping and cooked all his food - is he going to sue her too?


#6 Fenrir

Posted 07 February 2013 - 04:09 PM

QUOTE
I think people have a duty of care to themselves and should not expect to be exempt from taking responsibility about their own health.

And a Dr should be able to refuse to help a patient if they refuse to be active in the their treatment.

#7 Feral-as-Meggs

Posted 07 February 2013 - 07:12 PM

Interesting case.  The quote says that the doctor suggested weight loss surgery but the Court did not accept that occurred.   The Court found that the doctor did not offer referral to a bariatric surgeon, multidisciplinary obesity clinic or a liver specialist.  It's not a question of forcing him to go.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp...p;query=Almario

The Court found that Mr Almario also contributed to his condition by failing to manage his weight and deduced 20% from his award.  




#8 Elemental

Posted 07 February 2013 - 07:55 PM

http://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/action/pjudg?jgmtid=162435

I think that the appeal will at the very least decrease the payout. The assumption that a gastric band in 2003 would have arrested the plaintiffs liver disease and diabetes presumes both that he would have had no complications from the band and also achieved sustained weight loss - a claim that would be difficult to substantiate given the high rates of band failure in those without the insight to enact behavioural change. The startling claim that had surgery progressed that the diabetes would have been cured I felt most spurious of all, let alone the assumption that obesity is solely a medical condition, for which a patient bears only 20% responsibility, and that the only reasonable solution is WLS. The consequences of this action will be far reaching - if you are obese expect this to be brought up and documented at every visit.

#9 Feral Grey Mare

Posted 07 February 2013 - 07:58 PM

If the patient was not satisfied with the treatment he was receiving could he not have just changed doctors?

#10 Elemental

Posted 07 February 2013 - 08:14 PM

He had had multiple previous doctors who had all referred him for multiple weight loss strategies. I think a great deal of the appeal of the doctor he is suing is that the defendant didn't actually stress that his obesity was at the root of all evil.

#11 sueb31

Posted 07 February 2013 - 08:16 PM

"After the abandonment of the claim in deceit, Mr.  Almario  maintained as part of his negligence case that Dr. Varipatis (erroneously) represented to him that his health problems, including his liver problems, were caused (at least in substantial part) by exposure to toxic substances in the workplace and that the appropriate treatment was to undergo a series of detoxifications. The representations are said to be negligent in that a reasonable general practitioner in Dr. Varipatis' position ought to have known that the plaintiff's health problems, including his liver problems, were not caused by toxic exposure in the workplace, but were due to the combined effects of his morbid obesity and related conditions. Mr.  Almario  says that he relied upon Dr. Varipatis' negligent representations to his detriment by forming the belief that conventional modalities of treating obesity, like dieting and exercise, would not assist him."

This seems the key fact that is not well covered in the articles. That the doctor (allegedly) insisted that his problems were due to toxic chemical exposure, not obesity.

That puts a different slant on it all.

Sue

#12 bakesgirls

Posted 07 February 2013 - 08:34 PM

I think the whole case is ridiclous and hopefully the doctor can appeal successfully.

What ever happened to personal responsibility and accountability? The patient failed to manage his weight. Not the doctor. He needed to be proactive in regards to his own health and body, not expect somebody else to do it all for him.

#13 Freddie'sMum

Posted 07 February 2013 - 09:02 PM

I think the Judge is completely wrong in this case.

Just reading thru the article in the SMH - "it says that Mr Almario was convinced that his health problems were the result of a toxic work environment" (me - paraphrasing).

So even if the Doctor did say to him - you need to look at WLS - or something similar - I don't believe Mr Almario would have believed him anyway.

I really hope the Doctor wins on appeal - otherwise - I fully expect to be weighed and lectured - plus sign some sort of legal waiver form every time I go and visit my suburban GP.



#14 ednaboo

Posted 07 February 2013 - 09:06 PM

QUOTE (sueb31 @ 07/02/2013, 09:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
"After the abandonment of the claim in deceit, Mr.  Almario  maintained as part of his negligence case that Dr. Varipatis (erroneously) represented to him that his health problems, including his liver problems, were caused (at least in substantial part) by exposure to toxic substances in the workplace and that the appropriate treatment was to undergo a series of detoxifications. The representations are said to be negligent in that a reasonable general practitioner in Dr. Varipatis' position ought to have known that the plaintiff's health problems, including his liver problems, were not caused by toxic exposure in the workplace, but were due to the combined effects of his morbid obesity and related conditions. Mr.  Almario  says that he relied upon Dr. Varipatis' negligent representations to his detriment by forming the belief that conventional modalities of treating obesity, like dieting and exercise, would not assist him."

This seems the key fact that is not well covered in the articles. That the doctor (allegedly) insisted that his problems were due to toxic chemical exposure, not obesity.

That puts a different slant on it all.

Sue

Yes it does.  Sounds like this Dr is a quack.

#15 Erma Gerd

Posted 07 February 2013 - 09:59 PM

QUOTE (ednaboo @ 07/02/2013, 10:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Yes it does.  Sounds like this Dr is a quack.

I don't think it's just that- as a PP said, the plaintiff had been through a number of other doctors who had advised him to lose weight and referred him to dietary programs and even specialist obesity clinics. It sounds like he didn't want that advice- he gave quite conflicting evidence about whether he'd ever been advised to lose weight previously.

Yes, it appears that he did consult the defendant doctor specifically because the patient already believed chemical exposure was the root of his trouble and he wanted the sort of alternative treatment that this doctor provided. But even so, there is evidence that the doctor referred him to specialists that advised weight loss, and on more than one occasion discussed the need for weight loss and the implications of longstanding morbid obesity for the plaintiff's health.

QUOTE
The consequences of this action will be far reaching - if you are obese expect this to be brought up and documented at every visit.

Yes. I think lots of obese patients, smokers, non-vaccinators, poorly compliant diabetics etc are going to be having some difficult discussions with their GPs and probably leaving with reams of unwanted paperwork...  


#16 epl0822

Posted 07 February 2013 - 10:08 PM

The patient is a nutter. You would have to be pretty stupid to not understand the major health risks of obesity. The GP might have a duty of care to patients but individuals themselves have a greater responsibility to take care of their own health. It's not as though the guy had a brain tumour and the GP said, "Oh, just go take some vitamin pills and you'll be alright."

#17 FeralFemboside

Posted 07 February 2013 - 11:10 PM

I think you really need to read the judgement in full from the link on the first page of the thread to get a clear picture. The articles are not good summaries of the complexity of the situation.

It's clear the judge felt the GP failed to actually diagnose that the patient was actually suffering from liver disease and not just theoretically at risk from complications of being obese. The GP had ample evidence to conclude that this was the case and acknowledged that he knew that liver disease progressed to cirrhosis and potentially liver failure or cancer and was irreversible - yet he did not make such a diagnosis or communicate to the patient that weight loss was urgently required. It's really not the media headline of "Doctor did not refer patient for surgery!"

The doctor's defense about these issues (ie he had in fact discussed this with the patient) were not accepted by the judge because there was nothing at all about it in his notes. He also did not monitor the patient's liver function despite knowing that there had been abnormal results for over five years. So fundamentally the adverse judgement was because he failed the test of what a reasonably competent professional would do under those circumstances.

There was no shortage of evidence in front of the doctor that this patient was developing a potentially fatal illness as a result of his obesity, but he didn't diagnose, address or treat it, instead treating other co-morbid conditions. He didn't refer the patient to a liver specialist, instead assuming that a gastro-enterologist was taking care of that aspect, despite also knowing that the patient was no longer seeing that specialist. There was then another two year delay before referring the patient to a specialist who might deal with the liver issues, by which time it can be demonstrated that cirrhosis had started to occur.

So yes, I think he was negligent. Certainly a doctor cannot be required to enforce patient behavior, but they are required to apply their knowledge competently and make diagnoses. If I returned an abnormal pap smear result and my GP didn't tell me, failed to send me on for further testing and follow-up and I then developed cervical cancer I'd feel it was negligent. I don't doubt that this patient was complex because of his multiple conditions, but I agree with the judge that the ball was dropped. The patient might not have been able to prevent his cancer, he may have been refused surgery, he might not have complied with treatment, etc etc but the burden on his GP of writing a referral was tiny and there was a long window of opportunity in which it could have happened.

#18 Guest_~Coffee~_*

Posted 08 February 2013 - 03:36 AM

,

Edited by *SnowFlower*, 20 February 2013 - 04:55 PM.


#19 Erma Gerd

Posted 08 February 2013 - 08:43 AM

I've read the judgement in full, and a major part of the finding of negligence is not about the liver condition, but about failure to sort out the morbid obesity:
QUOTE
Summary of findings about negligence

    I find Dr Varipatis negligent in the following respects:

Failing to refer Mr  Almario  to a bariatric surgeon for consideration of his suitability for surgery of that type by 30 July, 1998;

In the alternative to (a), failing to take the appropriate steps I have described to re-refer Mr  Almario  to an obesity clinic;

Failing to refer Mr  Almario  to a hepatologist, or similarly qualified physician, by the end of September 2000 for the specific investigation and treatment of his liver condition.

It doesn't seem that the GP completely ignored the abnormal liver function- he did refer to a gastroenterologist, and yes, that was apparently an error because the gastro wasn't a hepatologist and didn't deal with that issue, but it was hardly this:
QUOTE
The doctor told him the wrong thing when the truth was staring him in the face. The doctor should have run proper tests, referals etc. Just like saying to someone, you don't have cancer you are fatigued due to xyz, without properly looking at the situation. It's negligence and the judge is correct.


There was a lot of evidence from representatives of the "reasonable doctor" that bariatric surgery was much less accepted as an intervention for this sort of patient at that time. The patient had been referred to obesity services repeatedly in the past (by other doctors) and he told this GP that when they discussed managing his obesity (with relevance to his other health issues, although not specifically his liver condition) and the judge accepted this.

The issue I have is with this:
QUOTE
The question is whether a reasonable doctor in Dr. Varipatis' position would have taken either of those precautions. Before answering that question, I should record that I accept the argument put on behalf of Mr.  Almario  that it is incumbent upon a medical practitioner to do more than merely point out the risks and counsel weight loss. I accept that Dr. Varipatis had the conversation, or one like it, that he says he had with Mr.  Almario  in October 1997. I accept he had the conversation with Mr.  Almario  on 30th July 1998 following the receipt of Dr. Yates' report, but I accept the submission that more was required.


I wonder how much more is required?

When a GP discusses something like weight loss, smoking cessation, reduction of alcohol intake etc with a patient, and offers what they consider some options, and the patient appears disinterested and dismisses them as having been tried previously without improvement, it's a difficult situation.

But I think what this finding means is that GPs can't let a happy smoker go on with it- they have to impress on them the importance of quitting and keep referring them to different solutions, even if the patient is utterly uninterested. Ditto weight loss for people with any weight related complication. Personally I think this is unreasonable.

#20 purplekitty

Posted 08 February 2013 - 10:04 AM

QUOTE (Erma Gerd @ 08/02/2013, 09:43 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I wonder how much more is required?

When a GP discusses something like weight loss, smoking cessation, reduction of alcohol intake etc with a patient, and offers what they consider some options, and the patient appears disinterested and dismisses them as having been tried previously without improvement, it's a difficult situation.

But I think what this finding means is that GPs can't let a happy smoker go on with it- they have to impress on them the importance of quitting and keep referring them to different solutions, even if the patient is utterly uninterested. Ditto weight loss for people with any weight related complication. Personally I think this is unreasonable.
And document it every very clearly in the patient's records,again and again. Maybe the patient should sign a document acknowledging what they have been told.
The ultimate endpoint is to refuse to treat those who will not act on the doctor's advice and recommendations, to protect from litigation. Great.

I think from all indications this GP's standard of practice would not pass scrutiny in a general sense but the implications for everybody(including other than doctors) is concerning.

#21 FeralFemboside

Posted 08 February 2013 - 10:08 AM

QUOTE (Erma Gerd @ 08/02/2013, 09:43 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I wonder how much more is required?


I thought the judgement was quite clear that the action required from the GP was referral to appropriate specialists / services. Which as the judge said, was a very slight burden to place on the GP.

I do agree that it will be interesting to see if the bariatric surgery findings hold up on appeal given the differing expert opinion.

#22 GenWhy

Posted 08 February 2013 - 11:48 AM

Personally I think it's a very interesting case and hopefully allows a precedent to be set. I was called to give evidence on a Dr who had referred a patient to a surgeon for needing her gallbladder removed. No hospital notes were checked at any stage during the referral process, her admission or during consultation with the surgeon. Surgery began and no gallbladder was found - this was due to it being removed at the same hospital 10 yrs earlier. The patient being of a certain age and unsure of medical terminology did not understand that gallbladder removal was the same as a cholecystectomy. She died 2 days after the operation from the surgeon perforating her bowel in several places whilst "searching" for a gallbladder.

More Drs need to be held accountable for not being thorough or following due process in my opinion. I also agree that the articles on this don't really reflect the issue at hand. The patient was told something different was causing his problem and no doubt saw no reason to believe there was another cause.

Edited due to bad wording

Edited by GenWhy, 08 February 2013 - 11:50 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

 

How to talk about your pregnancy at work

The workplace isn't always a friendly place for pregnant women. Yet working women inclined to conceal a pregnancy from prying coworkers may be better off opening up and carrying on, according to a new study.

Tell us your story to win!

To celebrate Mother's Day this year we are giving you the chance to win one of five great prizes simply by telling us your story.

Where to get help to help your baby sleep

There is so much pressure about having a baby who sleeps 'all night' , it's no wonder you worry about your baby if she wakes in the night.

Vintage baby names having a comeback

What makes some names have comebacks while others silently fade into oblivion? A few factors come into play.

When your partner doesn't want you to breastfeed

Dads can have many reasons for not wanting their partners to breastfeed their baby, but both parents should learn more about it before making a final decision.

Model mum Sarah Stage shares post-baby selfie

Most new mums would recoil at the thought, but Sarah Stage has shared a post-pregnancy selfie just four days after giving birth.

I'll admit it: I have last child parenting fatigue

If you're a new mum and feeling ignored by the older mum/the old hand/the has-been, please know, it's not you, it's me. Blame the last child parenting fatigue.

Exhaustion is not the same as tiredness

Having a new baby isn't tiring - it can be downright exhausting.

Five posterior babies, four home births

I was on a high. I'd done it all by myself with no help from anyone.

Mum's list of birthday gift demands goes viral

We're big fans of kids' birthday parties - but this is one bash we're glad we didn't get an invite to.

Kate Middleton to receive 'loyalty discount' for second birth

Everybody loves a bargain - including the Duchess of Cambridge.

Fish & chip shop owner's sad note goes viral

A lengthy note put on the window of a fish & chip shop has gone viral due to the writer's serious doubts about the romance of travel.

Pregnant women need good nutrition advice, not judgment

Pregnant women are under pressure to do all the "right things" to have a healthy child. It results in women feeling judged about their decisions.

When your child wants you to have another baby

Giving your child a sibling when you don't want to have another baby can be a complex issue.

William Tyrrell's mum speaks out: 'We hope he is still alive'

The mother of missing toddler William Tyrrell says she has a vision that somebody "picked him up and moved him on ... that's the only way ... to explain for him not to be there".

Family comes first for 23-year-old Tommy Connolly

Most 23-year-old blokes spend their hard earned cash on fun times with mates or romantic dinners with their girlfriend, but not Tommy Connolly.

Newborn all-girl quintuplets 'doing great'

The first all-female quintuplets born in the United States were delivered last week, at 28 weeks and two days.

Model mum's big baby silences critics

He may be less than a week old, but baby James Hunter has already helped his model mum silence her critics.

Jammy, Hula Hoop, Rage: Reddit reveals most unusual baby names

A recent Reddit thread has revealed some of the more creative names in the world.

Woman awakens from coma, learns she gave birth

A US woman awakened this week from a four-month-long coma that doctors had feared would be permanent and learned that she had given birth to a baby boy, according to her family.

'Give us a break': mum sent shocking letter over Facebook baby pics

Posting a lot of baby photos doesn't make you a bad person. It may make your Facebook feed a little irritating, but it doesn't make you a bad person.

In defense of the dads who do so much

It's time to shift the focus off what dads aren’t doing and shine it on what they are.

The modern cloth nappies too cute to cover up

If you're only just joining the modern cloth nappy movement, or would like to spruce up your collection, we have to introduce you to Designer Bums.

How breastfeeding can affect your libido

When you’ve just had a baby, having sex isn’t usually top priority. In fact, for a lot of women it rates about as appealing as changing another dirty nappy.

Should pregnant women be allowed to use 'parent and child' car parking spots?

Is it acceptable to use these car parking spots when pregnant? How many of us would admit to doing it?

Healthy baby from sperm taken 48 hours after a man died

Fertility doctors have described their "most extraordinary case" - creating a healthy baby from sperm taken 48 hours after a man had died.

Sign up to our 30 days of #PlayIQ challenge

Sign up to receive 30 amazing tips and ideas for play with baby during the month of April and submit a picture or tip on our social wall for a chance to win an amazing Fisher-Price prize pack.

 
Advertisement
 
Advertisement
 
 
 

What's hot on EB

Last chance to win a year's supply of toys

You have less than a week left to win your child one of five Fisher-Price toy packs valued at over $600 each - hurry, enter today!

Childcare is a big problem, but there's more to it

Let’s keep talking about these issues and not allow them to be put into a neat little box that’s labelled ‘Fix childcare and everything is solved’.

Pink's awesome response to body-shaming trolls

When trolls felt the need to comment on 35-year-old singer-songwriter Pink's weight, her answer was an awesome ode to body love.

Fertility clinic offers egg donors $5000

A national chain of fertility clinics is offering egg donors a $5000 payment to cover their expenses, a first for Australia which is raising concerns the money could act as an inducement.

Baby boy abandoned in India amid fresh surrogacy concerns

Australian officials could do nothing to stop an Australian couple from abandoning their baby son, born through surrogacy in India, after they decided they did not want to bring him to Australia.

Herd immunity and community responsibility: how free-riders can make kids suffer

Individual choice works for haircuts and handbags, but not for preventing infectious diseases that kill kids.

Photographer captures 'unexpected beauty' of birth

If there is one thing Leilani Rogers knows about childbirth, it is that no two deliveries are ever the same.

Expectations vs the reality of making a toddler's clothes

Note to self: less sewing, more life. Not the party dress, but the party. The toddler, as usual, has it all figured out.

Mum meets 'dead' daughter 49 years after birth

In 1965, Zella Jackson-Price was told her premature baby girl had died shortly after birth.

How pregnancy probiotics can help you and your baby

New research suggests that taking specific pregnancy probiotics could be the answer to a range of common pregnancy side effects.

53 creative pregnancy announcements

Announcing that you're expecting can be a time to express your creativity, sense of humour and imagination. Check out how other parents and parents-to-be have broken the news to friends and family.

IKEA hacks for the nursery and kids' rooms

Are you one of those that know the whole IKEA catalogue by heart? Love their stuff but want to personalise it? Here's some inspiration to help you realise the potential of IKEA furniture and fittings.

36 baby names inspired by food and drinks

A French court may have ruled out Nutella as a baby name, but that doesn't have to stop you from taking inspiration from the supermarket (or bottle shop). See what parents in the US have chosen for their delicious little ones.

 

ENTER NOW!

Win a year's worth of toys

Last week to submit a picture of your baby at play for your chance to win. Visit the Play Wall to view our recent entries.

 
Advertisement
 
 
Essential Baby and Essential Kids is the place to find parenting information and parenting support relating to conception, pregnancy, birth, babies, toddlers, kids, maternity, family budgeting, family travel, nutrition and wellbeing, family entertainment, kids entertainment, tips for the family home, child-friendly recipes and parenting. Try our pregnancy due date calculator to determine your due date, or our ovulation calculator to predict ovulation and your fertile period. Our pregnancy week by week guide shows your baby's stages of development. Access our very active mum's discussion groups in the Essential Baby forums or the Essential Kids forums to talk to mums about conception, pregnancy, birth, babies, toddlers, kids and parenting lifestyle. Essential Baby also offers a baby names database of more than 22,000 baby names, popular baby names, boys' names, girls' names and baby names advice in our baby names forum. Essential Kids features a range of free printable worksheets for kids from preschool years through to primary school years. For the latest baby clothes, maternity clothes, maternity accessories, toddler products, kids toys and kids clothing, breastfeeding and other parenting resources, check out Essential Baby and Essential Kids.