Jump to content

Big Business of IVF has human cost


  • Please log in to reply
50 replies to this topic

#1 Three Of Hearts

Posted 13 January 2013 - 01:45 PM

An editorial in todays Herald Sun (for those who couldn't read it without logging in)

QUOTE
Big Business of IVF has human cost

By Melinda Tankard Reist

I DON'T want to discuss the personal  IVF journey of Tony Abbott's staffer Peta Credlin. Others can examine  the politics of the Opposition Leader's foray into the issue this past  week. But there is a new opportunity to talk about IVF. It is difficult  to criticise a procedure seen as "life-giving", and tempting to overlook  the human costs.

The Opposition Leader says he supports IVF  because he is "pro family". But we need to face the reality that despite  IVF industry publicity, with photos of smiling babies set to pastel,  most couples undergoing the procedure will never see a live baby.

In  2010, there were 61,774 assisted reproductive technology (ART)  treatment cycles performed in Australia and NZ. Of these, a mere 18.1  per cent resulted in a live baby.

There is a higher risk of  miscarriage, terminations for foetal abnormality, stillbirth, a 2.5  times higher rate of death, a high risk of caesarean and pre-term birth,  (33 per cent in IVF babies, 7.9 per cent in non-IVF babies) and low  birth weight (26.4 per cent, 6.8 per cent in non-IVF babies).

   IVF babies have more health problems. A large Ontario study found a 58 per cent greater risk of defects in IVF infants.

There's  an increased risk of heart defects (2.1 times), cleft lip/palate (2.4  times) and anorectal atresia (3.7 times). Gastrointestinal problems are  nine times higher in IVF babies. A Switzerland study has found  abnormalities in the blood vessels of 12-year-olds born through IVF.

There  are ethical concerns about the thousands of stockpiled frozen embryos  -- about 40,000 in Victoria. Most are destroyed (20,000 discarded in  Victoria in 10 years) and many are used in experiments.

Then there is the cost.

Medicare underwrote $217.4 million in costs from July 2011 to June 2012.

The cost of an IVF baby to women aged 30-33 years is $27,000, and for women 42-45 it is $131,000.

Egg  extraction involves weeks of psychological and medical testing,  followed by hormone injections. A long needle is used to pierce the wall  of the vagina, access the ovaries and remove the eggs. The aim is to  get as many eggs as possible. I know women who have had more than 20  eggs extracted.

Side-effects of the hormones include hot flushes,  emotional turmoil, bloating, visual changes, ovarian hyperstimulation  syndrome and multiple pregnancy. Ninety-two IVF cycles in 2010 resulted  in one or more of the foetuses being aborted.

An estimated 10 per cent of women develop hyperstimulation syndrome, which can be fatal. There were 206 cases in 2010.

Researchers  from the Netherlands have found that women having ovarian stimulation  have a twice as high a risk of ovarian malignancies.

Given the lack of adequate safety data, how can women exercise informed consent?

Marketed  as the only option, women are often put on the IVF treadmill before  others are explored. I know women referred to IVF in their late 20s who,  after abandoning the program, went on to have children naturally.

Of  course many couples would adopt if it wasn't so costly (up to $50,000  per child) and time-consuming. Australia has been accused of having an  anti-adoption ethos, with the lowest adoption rate in the developing  world.

In 2011-12, there were 333 adoptions in Australia (149 from overseas) - the lowest on record.

Yes,  there is a strong desire for a baby. But research on women's  experiences of ART shows many feel physically, emotionally and  financially drained, and suffer anxiety, depression and relationship  problems.

Women have a right to realistic expectations about  outcomes and risks. Some women say they were given hope but not enough  information. We welcome every baby born but this huge global enterprise  has not cured infertility.

While it may have brought joy to some  women with the birth of a baby, it has come with significant physical  and emotional suffering for many more.

To advertise failure rates is hardly a winning business strategy. But we cannot overlook the human cost of IVF.

Edited by Allie_D, 13 January 2013 - 06:21 PM.


#2 password123

Posted 13 January 2013 - 01:50 PM

As someone who has been through ivf, I find that article highly discouraging and negative.
It just leaves me with a bad taste in my mouth. Don't know why.


#3 bettinae

Posted 13 January 2013 - 01:59 PM

I just read the article and DH and I had two failed attempts at IVF and it was one of the hardest times of our life and then after a year of again more drugs and trying with the drugs and just us we gave up we just didnt have the money to go again and the very next month we fell naturally........ we are due in june 13

I just wonder is it money driven by the FS...?

Its a big debate and a very emotional one at that...... sad.gif

The desire does over rule a lot of the time that maternal instinct is sooo strong well it was for me .....

x bbighug.gif

#4 Guest_Dinah_Harris_*

Posted 13 January 2013 - 01:59 PM

Was the article written by someone who has faced the prospect of being childless?  The heartache of lost babies?  
There ARE a lot of positives when it comes to IVF, as well.  I was informed of all the risk factors, suffered a few of them myself, and have two healthy children I otherwise would not have had.
To the best of my knowledge, my children don't have any defects.
These kinds of articles kind of me feel as if doing IVF was selfish and that my poor children shouldn't have been born.   sad.gif


#5 Feral-as-Meggs

Posted 13 January 2013 - 02:02 PM

I dont get the point of the article.

Infertility is a medical condition.  It can be related to a genetic condition, a syndrome like PCOS, a disease process like PID, endometriosis, previous cancer treatment etc.  IVF is a medical treatment, and has its risks and side effects.  

Most of the averse statistics quoted in the article are not due to IVF per se but due to the underlying reason for the infertility, the risk of multiples and higher maternal age.  

I don't see the big hoo ha over the risks, side effects, stresses and strains of medical treatment for cancer etc.  



#6 kiwi-girl

Posted 13 January 2013 - 02:05 PM

I disliked this article, it very negative and I think it is pushing an adoption agenda. Ivf does not 'cure'infertility but either does adoption.  There are plenty of children who are conceived without the assistance of ivf who have medical problems but nothing is said about that. I would not be pregnant right now if it was not for ivf, and we did not go down this path lightly, nor did our specialist push us in it.

There is so much more that can be said but I suspect the writer is not open to hearing other points of view.


#7 password123

Posted 13 January 2013 - 02:07 PM

QUOTE (Dinah_Harris @ 13/01/2013, 02:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Was the article written by someone who has faced the prospect of being childless?  The heartache of lost babies?  
There ARE a lot of positives when it comes to IVF, as well.  I was informed of all the risk factors, suffered a few of them myself, and have two healthy children I otherwise would not have had.
To the best of my knowledge, my children don't have any defects.
These kinds of articles kind of me feel as if doing IVF was selfish and that my poor children shouldn't have been born.   sad.gif


Yep. I knew someone would come along and articulate it for me. Especially the last sentence. That's exactly how I felt reading it plus I now also feel like we shouldn't bother going back for number 2 sad.gif


#8 sqawk

Posted 13 January 2013 - 02:11 PM

I would like to see their sources for their stats partic those re congenital defects, c section rates etc. the overall c section rate is about 31% for all women. Considering ivf babies make up only a few percent of babies born, there is no way the c section rate for non-ivf babies is around 8%.

I'm sure there was an Australian study that showed no evidence of increased congenital or genetic defects except for Y chromosome disorders which are over represented in ivf couples as it causes male infertility.  And there is no consensus that there is an increase in ovarian or breast cancer risk

I think the author clearly has there own agenda

Other issues raised come down to individual practitioners eg recommending ivf to a young couple with unexplained infertility.

#9 Guest_Dinah_Harris_*

Posted 13 January 2013 - 02:14 PM

QUOTE (Mrs_Snorks @ 13/01/2013, 02:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Yep. I knew someone would come along and articulate it for me. Especially the last sentence. That's exactly how I felt reading it plus I now also feel like we shouldn't bother going back for number 2 sad.gif


In my biased opinion, you should if you can.  It is totally worth it.  original.gif

#10 casime

Posted 13 January 2013 - 02:20 PM

I've read it a few times, and I've tried to articulate an appropriate response to the author about how I feel about what they have written.  Unfortunately, I find it hard to get beyond "go **** yourself."   rant.gif

#11 kwiggle

Posted 13 January 2013 - 02:21 PM

These stats are very different to those quoted by some well respected clinics - some cycles have up to a 45% success rate in the right hands, way better than the 20% of a normally fertile couple doing it the old fashioned way!  
You have to remember too that the some of the group of people seeking IVF may have never had a live birth without this assistance, so the fact that they take a baby home at all is an amazing gift.
Noone understands why some couples have difficulty - unexplained subfertility is a huge part of the IVF clinic's work, so there are increased risks of problems and failures if we don't know why they struggle in the first place.... but to have success at all is a wonderful thing, and has lead to great happiness for many.

#12 WinterIsComing

Posted 13 January 2013 - 02:24 PM

I haven't been through the IVF but came very close to (I discovered I was pregnant shortly before the appointment with a FS).

The article is plain damn ugly. The accusatory tone, that plainly implies that people choosing to go down the path of IFV is, firstly, naïve (or stupid) due to such low success rates, and secondly, selfish, since they are choosing to give birth to all those sick babies.

I don't believe the statistics, especially the caesarean rate. Also, a defect is anything which is not 100% textbook. For example, many babies are born with a tiny hole in their heart, which practically doesn't mean anything - they are still 100% and the hole often closes as they grow. Still, it would be classified as a congenital defect.

Why doesn't the article mentions anything about the enormous joy IVF has brought for so many people? For younger couples, IVF has pretty damn good success rates!



#13 librablonde

Posted 13 January 2013 - 02:27 PM

That article offered no other solutions to childlessness so what was its point???? To make infertile clients feel guilty and selfish??  At least IVF offers hope and a chance at being a mum and many patients are willing to take that gamble. It's also an educated gamble. You are educated before starting IVF and do counselling to ensure it's what you want. It's like saying a cancer patient should be denied chemo b/c chemo doesn't always work and yet chemo is touted as the "cure". We all know chemo isn't going to work for everyone but it works for some. It offers hope and a chance. That's worth a lot.

#14 Satay Chicken

Posted 13 January 2013 - 02:28 PM

This is such a negative article, probably one of the worst I have ever read.

For starters, the 18.1% live birth rate would be over all age groups, per transfer - the article implies its the overall success rate which is wrong.  When you think about it, 18.1% success rate per transfer is pretty good when most doing IVF have a success rate of close to 0% had they not given IVF a try.

Secondly, if IVF was so risky wouldn't these clinics be covering themselves legally (especially in Australia)? I never signed any documents that made me aware if I conceived my risk of having a baby with problems was so much higher than a naturally conceived baby.  I was however advised a number of times that my risk of a baby with a cleft palate was double but that was because of the medication I was on (nothing to do with the IVF per se).

I've been one of the very lucky ones to conceive first transfer and every day I am so grateful that I conceived through IVF with relative ease - my heart goes out to those who try again and again, their courage is amazing.  These articles are unfair, have limited proof and should be read with a grain of salt.

#15 Little.One

Posted 13 January 2013 - 02:34 PM

QUOTE (meggs1 @ 13/01/2013, 03:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Most of the averse statistics quoted in the article are not due to IVF per se but due to the underlying reason for the infertility, the risk of multiples and higher maternal age.


Exactly right!

#16 MaeGlyn

Posted 13 January 2013 - 02:35 PM

Yes isn't all birth coming with a negative side. Some people have to have caesareans, a friend of mine just had a baby with a tumor who is undergoing chemotherapy, I had kidney failure due to infection not due to IVF in the first 3 months. Why have children at all?

Because when my son was born from IVF in 2009, the year before the articles information, I went into labor at 39 weeks and when he was born I looked into his eyes and made a memory of feeling love that I never thought I could feel. Because when he was 3 months old he gave us his first smile, because he tells me and daddy at 3 to be happy and we are friends, because he tells me at 3 that when he grows up he is going to be tall.  hheart.gif  

There is this side of IVF then there is another side, the human side. The medical side of IVF was for such a short period of time in our lives.

#17 Lifesgood

Posted 13 January 2013 - 02:38 PM

My initial thoughts on the article are what a crock of sh*t.

On second thoughts.....I still think it is a crock of sh*t.

Poorly written, poorly researched, inexplicably biased, I simply have no idea what the author is on about exactly.

#18 password123

Posted 13 January 2013 - 02:41 PM

QUOTE (Dinah_Harris @ 13/01/2013, 03:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
In my biased opinion, you should if you can.  It is totally worth it.  original.gif

Thanks original.gif

QUOTE (casime @ 13/01/2013, 03:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I've read it a few times, and I've tried to articulate an appropriate response to the author about how I feel about what they have written.  Unfortunately, I find it hard to get beyond "go **** yourself."   rant.gif


Lol. Exactly!

#19 MsFeralPerthFembo

Posted 13 January 2013 - 02:43 PM

Very negative article and I'm not sure what the point was?

I do agree on the adoption issue though. There are so many children in the world that need homes, yet so many australian couples wanting to provide that are met with astronomical costs, ridiculous waiting lists and red tape sad.gif

Edited by JBaby, 13 January 2013 - 03:10 PM.


#20 Lifesgood

Posted 13 January 2013 - 02:54 PM

It's written by Melinda Tankard Reist. She is an opinion writer and feminist. She is a mother of four and is 49 y/o.

Here are a couple of articles about her.

http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/life/whos-...0110-1psdx.html
http://www.mamamia.com.au/news/melinda-tan...n-you-have-all/

Her writing style gets up my nose.

#21 Jamelex

Posted 13 January 2013 - 03:02 PM

That article just gave me a sinking feeling sad.gif

While our journey wasn't typical (we were also lucky enough to be successful first cycle), pretty much nothing in that article reflected our experience. If there is higher risks? That is something we were obviously prepared to chance, and I cannot regret that as I sit here watching DS (16months) repeatedly filling and emptying a bag with his toys, and then clambering on my lap for a cuddle.

We are now considering how long to try normally again before 'resorting' to IVF in the hope of a second child.

#22 kadoodle

Posted 13 January 2013 - 03:16 PM

It's the Herald Sun, 'nuff said.

ed to remove signature

Edited by kadoodle, 13 January 2013 - 03:24 PM.


#23 Three Of Hearts

Posted 13 January 2013 - 06:19 PM

As someone who is just about to get their first IVF cycle underway, and who has no other options, the article made me feel quite scared about everything.

It does seem very one sided though, especially the bit about knowing people who had given up on IVF and gone on to have children naturally.

#24 Mozzie1

Posted 13 January 2013 - 06:36 PM

Melinda Tankard Reist is a well known feminist activist - who also happens to be deeply religious. She is Christian of some denomination (hillsong?), although she hides this is a lot of her work. She is of the same mould who say feminists should oppose abortion, because it's bad for women.

My gut feeling is that IVF is not condoned in her religion, so she is arguing against it on the basis that it's difficult for the people undergoing it.

I have no basis for this, just a gut feeling and I could be totally wrong.

Either way, the article stinks. The comparison should be made between IVF vs no children, not IVF vs having a child naturally.


QUOTE (sqawk @ 13/01/2013, 03:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I would like to see their sources for their stats partic those re congenital defects, c section rates etc. the overall c section rate is about 31% for all women. Considering ivf babies make up only a few percent of babies born, there is no way the c section rate for non-ivf babies is around 8%.


It's badly worded, but I think she means the pre-term rate is 33% vs 8%, not the c section rate.

#25 panikymama

Posted 13 January 2013 - 06:44 PM

I don't post a lot but just had to when I read this one. Sometimes I cannot believe what kind of junk is allowed to go to print. (Did the editors do no checking)!!

This article is full of ill-informed opinions, poorly twisted stats and a general shade of nastiness for good measure.

The author fails to mention that IVF gives a lot of infertile couples hope and an opportunity to try everything before giving into a future without children.

For us, and many couples that we know both through forums and IRL, IVF has been a beautiful blessing. Yes, there are still unfortunately (and devastatingly) couples who do not succeed with IVF and that is a tragedy I, and probably every fertility specialist would change if they could. But IVF when successful, fills a hole for many couples that makes all of the risks, all of the medication and all of the treatments worthwhile.

To the girls reading this article and being scared off or second guessing.... don't!! Yes, there are risks (much more minimal than the author cares to acknowledge) and yes, there is the possibility that things may not work out, but if infertility is your only other option then what have you got to loose!!

Once again, as I mentioned earlier, this is a ridiculous article that really should never have made it past editing.....


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

 

5 workplace lessons for new parents

Take heart in these principles that will transfer seamlessly from the workplace into your new life as a parent.

Review: The Volvo 2015 XC90 SUV has all the safety features your family needs

The new Volvo XC90 SUV's focus on keeping you safe does not come at the expense of comfort in the XC90.

Kim Kardashian reveals she may have hysterectomy

Kim Kardashian has revealed complications during pregnancy means she might have to have a hysterectomy after the birth of her second child.

Why late night snacks wreak havoc on weight loss

 Loath as you may be to admit it, chances are that at some point you have found yourself in the kitchen late at night, devouring food.

Toddler twins pretend to be asleep to fool mum

They say twins have a unique connection. If this cute clip is anything to go by, these toddler sisters like to use their special bond to try to fool their mother.

Dads who do their share have more sex: study

For women trying to encourage their partners to take more interest in fatherhood, it could be the ultimate incentive.

Think you might have IBS, coeliac disease or Crohn's? Here's what you need to know

Conditions affecting the gastrointestinal tract are common in modern humans, and many are on the rise - including irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and coeliac disease.

Couple poses for newborn shoot with adorable puppy

Tired of being asked about their baby-making plans, Australian couple Matt and Abby decided to give a creative answer.

Win a Mountain Buggy Swift

To celebrate Essential Baby reaching half a million Facebook fans, we have a Mountain Buggy Swift to giveaway to a lucky fan.

When your toddler disagrees

There comes a time when your child starts having different views to you. I didn't realise that time would come so soon.

The exercises you know you should be doing (but probably aren't)

I bet your to-do list today is long. But somewhere on that massive list, are you making time for your pelvic floor?

How did we have babies before apps came along?

Three months ago, my wife, Chrysta, and I were driving along Melrose Avenue in Los Angeles when she let out a harrowing cry.

This baby really loves the family cat

Some babies get excited when mum or dad come to get them from their cot after a nap.

Woman gives birth after having her own mother's uterus transplanted

In a world first, a healthy baby has been born from the same womb that nurtured his own mother.

Home brand foods contain less salt than pricier rivals

Supermarket home brand foods, long derided as cheap and inferior, contain far lower levels of salt than pricier, branded rivals, new research shows.

Early exposure to peanuts recommended for allergy prevention

A paediatricians' group is recommending that infants at high risk of peanut allergies be given foods containing peanuts before they turn one.

Nannies for hire, wherever you're flying

Ever dreaded the prospect of a long flight, dreaming about how wonderful it would be for a nanny to entertain the kids?

Is it okay to name your baby with a sense of humour?

My husband was sure that Danger was a good option for a boy. And as the pregnancy progressed, it actually started to sound really good.

So hot right now: double-barrelled baby names on the rise

It's one way to make your baby stand out from the pack – giving them not one, but two first names.

Second time around: is it really better the devil you know?

When I fell pregnant with my second child I was, naturally, very excited. Then it all started to come back to me - and I freaked.

Shopping with kids: breaking the pester-power cycle

You're out shopping with your little one and they're incessantly whining that they want a treat. It's easy to say no ... the first time, at least.

Get your FREE Baby & Toddler Show ticket!

Get your free ticket to the Sydney Essential Baby & Toddler Show for September 25-27 - register online now.

 
Advertisement
 
Advertisement
 
 
 

What's hot on EB

The worst 20 minutes of my life

Thirty seconds was all it took to turn a shopping trip into my worst nightmare.

Top baby names for England and Wales in 2014

George has overtaken William in the official rankings of most popular British baby names - and Game of Thrones is still having an impact on parents.

Baseball or baby? Dad's tough choice

What's more important, a baby or a baseball? That's a question this dad seems to struggle with.

Childbirth choices: five star or free?

It's not often you hear the words labour and luxury in the same sentence but for some, a 5-star start to parenthood is exactly what they seek. And with a number of private hospitals now offering packages which include a post-birth stay at a sumptuous first class resort, many mums are choosing to recover in style.

'Where did your boobies go, Mummy?' and other soul-destroying comments from kids

Most women carry a smidge of baby weight after giving birth. If you're lucky enough to have an older child in the house, they can keep you on track with your weight loss goals.

Do you read me, baby?

Is it too soon to be reading to my two-month-old son? If not, what should I read?

Minimising sibling rivalry when you've got a baby

Sibling rivalry is an act of competition, but if your children feel involved and special, this type of jealousy will be minimised.

Will studying on maternity leave take you away from your most important job?

I remember when I was trying to decide if I could combine motherhood and furthering my university education.

Win a Pacapod this Father's Day

To celebrate dads and families, we are giving away a Picos Pack from Pacapod Australia filled with a few extra goodies ENTER NOW

Preschooler hit by car shortly after baby brother's death

A mother has had a frantic race to the hospital after her daughter was hit by a car, just four weeks after her infant son died.

Gay couple and Thai surrogate in custody tug-of-war

A six-month-old baby girl is trapped in the Thai capital in a bitter custody wrangle between her Thai surrogate mother and her biological father.

Couple denied IVF over parenting concerns

A mother of six has been denied access to IVF treatment in order to have another child over concerns about her parenting skills.

The book that promises to put your children to sleep

Exhausted parents from around the world are singing the praises of a "miracle" book which promises to put even the most restless child to sleep in just minutes.

5 things every parent who feels guilty needs to know

Parenthood can make you feel bad, but you're not alone.

Royals criticise 'dangerous' attempts to photograph Prince George

The British royal family criticized paparazzi on Friday for what it called their increasingly dangerous attempts to photograph young Prince George.

'No jab, no play' rule to cover Victorian kindergartens and childcare centres

"Anti-vaxxers" face not being able to send their children to childcare centres or kindergarten if they refuse to have them immunised.

15,000 birthing kits on their way to developing countries

Giving birth in a hospital surrounded by medical experts is tough enough, but some women deliver babies without a clean sheet to lie on.

Photo of premmie 'too graphic', fundraising site says

When their son Jacob was born at just 27 weeks, Christina and Jeff Hinks were thrown into an uncertain world.

The latest Bugaboo collections: cool chevron and runner prams

Bugaboo sure likes to keep things fresh, and with the Australian spring/summer season coming up, there are two new Bugaboo pram releases.

Making room for two in the bed

Mum's room or their own room? Cot or bassinets? Deciding where twins will sleep can be tricky.

 

FREE TICKET

See Hi-5 LIVE in Sydney!

Get your free ticket to The Essential Baby & Toddler Show and save $20 - register online now!

 
Advertisement
 
 
Essential Baby and Essential Kids is the place to find parenting information and parenting support relating to conception, pregnancy, birth, babies, toddlers, kids, maternity, family budgeting, family travel, nutrition and wellbeing, family entertainment, kids entertainment, tips for the family home, child-friendly recipes and parenting. Try our pregnancy due date calculator to determine your due date, or our ovulation calculator to predict ovulation and your fertile period. Our pregnancy week by week guide shows your baby's stages of development. Access our very active mum's discussion groups in the Essential Baby forums or the Essential Kids forums to talk to mums about conception, pregnancy, birth, babies, toddlers, kids and parenting lifestyle. Essential Baby also offers a baby names database of more than 22,000 baby names, popular baby names, boys' names, girls' names and baby names advice in our baby names forum. Essential Kids features a range of free printable worksheets for kids from preschool years through to primary school years. For the latest baby clothes, maternity clothes, maternity accessories, toddler products, kids toys and kids clothing, breastfeeding and other parenting resources, check out Essential Baby and Essential Kids.