Okay, so the situation is this.
While I am studying for exams, DH decided to take DS on a long walk to a local shopping village with some nice shops.
DS had just woken up from a nap and had on his post-lunch clothes. A top (grey white stripe) with about 7 small but bright orange (pumpkin mash) lunch stains on the front and sleeves (he fell asleep right after lunch).
I wanted to change DS but DH was insisting that they go asap. I pointed out that he shouldn't take out DS in clothes which were in a condition that DH would not wear out himself and that a change of clothes would only take a few minutes (and that I would do it).
DH strongly insisted that he would not mind going out in clothes in the same condition as DS's clothes. (Background: DH is very conscious of his appearance and likes to look after himself - nice clothes, neat hair, well groomed - spends more time on this than me).
To avoid an argument (and demonstrate to DH that his arguments did not hold water) I went to the kitchen and brought back a tiny piece of mango. I then smeared the mango (small 5 cent piece size stain) on the front of his white tennis polo shirt - while he was distracted - so no holding down and forcing involved

DH thinks I am crazy for doing this and it was outside the realm of reason. He was appalled to say the least.
I say that, in the circumstances, it was a reasonable way to establish that he would not himself wear stained clothes (and therefore should not make DS wear them).
So what do you think? Would you have done the same? Is it a little loopy or a perfectly reasonable way to diffuse an argument?
**note: we are both having a good laugh about it but still disagree on approach. DH is now on a walk with a cleanly clothed DS and the mango stain rinsed out of his polo top

ETC: small typo
This post has been edited by FauxPas: 07/11/2009, 03:35 PM